Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Jeep Compass
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 4 to 3
Biggest differences: Consumption — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 13.4 kWh/100 km, Jeep Compass 17.8 kWh/100 km · 0–100 km/h — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 6.6 s, Jeep Compass 8.3 s · Battery — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 77 kWh, Jeep Compass 96.3 kWh.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is a C-segment coupe SUV, in model year 2027 in four variants: WLTP range from 451 to 576 km, power from 204 to 340 hp.
Jeep Compass
The Jeep Compass is a C-segment SUV in three electric variants: WLTP range from 500 to 674 km, power from 213 to 375 hp.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Jeep Compass
Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron performance
Jeep CompassLong Range FWD (96,3 kWh)
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Jeep Compass — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 4 to 3
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmJeep Compass +98 km
- Battery kWhJeep Compass +19.3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −4.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +55 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −1.7 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +5 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lJeep Compass +23 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Jeep Compass
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron e-tron performance | Jeep Compass Long Range FWD (96,3 kWh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 576 km | 674 km | Jeep +98 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 96.3 kWh | Jeep +19.3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.4 kWh/100 km | 17.8 kWh/100 km | Audi −4.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 160 kW | Audi +5 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 20–80% ↓ | — | 27 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 15 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 231 PS | Audi +55 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 8.3 s | Audi −1.7 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 2160 kg | — |
| Boot | 527 l | 550 l | Jeep +23 l |
| Length | — | 4548 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1936 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1657 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | 2795 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Jeep Compass
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Jeep Compass
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Jeep Compass?
The Jeep Compass goes further: 674 km WLTP against the 576 km of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron. That is a difference of 98 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron and the Jeep Compass differ?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 286 PS. The Jeep Compass has FWD and 231 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 165 kW DC, the Jeep Compass up to 160 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron uses less electricity: 13.4 kWh/100 km against 17.8 kWh/100 km in the Jeep Compass. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 660 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.