Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs BYD Atto 3
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 4 to 3
Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 165 kW, BYD Atto 3 220 kW · Consumption — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 13.4 kWh/100 km, BYD Atto 3 16.4 kWh/100 km · 0–100 km/h — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 6.6 s, BYD Atto 3 5.5 s.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is a C-segment coupe SUV, in model year 2027 in four variants: WLTP range from 451 to 576 km, power from 204 to 340 hp.
BYD Atto 3
The BYD Atto 3 is an SUV in the C segment, offering three different configurations of power output and range according to the WLTP standard.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs BYD Atto 3
Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron performance
BYD Atto 3Design
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or BYD Atto 3 — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 4 to 3
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +66 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +2.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSBYD Atto 3 +27 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sBYD Atto 3 −1.1 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWBYD Atto 3 +55 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +37 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs BYD Atto 3
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron e-tron performance | BYD Atto 3 Design | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 576 km | 510 km | Audi +66 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 74.8 kWh | Audi +2.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.4 kWh/100 km | 16.4 kWh/100 km | Audi −3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 220 kW | BYD +55 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 25 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 14.3 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 800 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 313 PS | BYD +27 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 5.5 s | BYD −1.1 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 1880 kg | — |
| Boot | 527 l | 490 l | Audi +37 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only BYD |
| Length | — | 4455 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1875 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1615 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | 2720 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
BYD Atto 3
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
BYD Atto 3
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or BYD Atto 3?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron goes further: 576 km WLTP against the 510 km of the BYD Atto 3. That is a difference of 66 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the BYD Atto 3 — its 74.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 165 kW DC, the BYD Atto 3 up to 220 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron uses less electricity: 13.4 kWh/100 km against 16.4 kWh/100 km in the BYD Atto 3. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 450 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.