Audi e-tron GT vs Lotus Emeya
Biggest differences: AC charging — Audi e-tron GT 11 kW, Lotus Emeya 22 kW · Charging 10–80% — Audi e-tron GT 18 min, Lotus Emeya 14 min · DC charging — Audi e-tron GT 320 kW, Lotus Emeya 403 kW.
Audi e-tron GT
The Audi e-tron GT is an all-electric sedan in the F segment, offering all-wheel drive and high-performance powertrains.
Lotus Emeya
The Lotus Emeya is a sporty sedan in the F-segment, offering a long range in the GT version and extreme performance in the R version.
Profile against the market: Audi e-tron GT vs Lotus Emeya
Audi e-tron GTquattro
Lotus EmeyaGT
Audi e-tron GT or Lotus Emeya — who wins where
Lotus Emeya leads 7 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi e-tron GT +12 km
- Battery kWhLotus Emeya +1.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi e-tron GT −2.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSLotus Emeya +109 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi e-tron GT −0.2 s
- Top speed km/hLotus Emeya +5 km/h
- DC charging kWLotus Emeya +83 kW
- AC charging kWLotus Emeya +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minLotus Emeya −4 min
- Weight ↓ kgAudi e-tron GT −210 kg
- Boot lLotus Emeya +104 l
Technical data: Audi e-tron GT vs Lotus Emeya
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi e-tron GT quattro | Lotus Emeya GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 622 km | 610 km | Audi +12 km |
| Battery | 97 kWh | 98.9 kWh | Lotus +1.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.8 kWh/100 km | 20.4 kWh/100 km | Audi −2.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 320 kW | 403 kW | Lotus +83 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Lotus +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 18 min | 14 min | Lotus −4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 24.2 km/min | 30.5 km/min | Lotus +6.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 503 PS | 612 PS | Lotus +109 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4 s | 4.15 s | Audi −0.2 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 250 km/h | Lotus +5 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2280 kg | 2490 kg | Audi −210 kg |
| Boot | 405 l | 509 l | Lotus +104 l |
| Length | 4997 mm | 5139 mm | Lotus +142 mm |
| Width | 1964 mm | 2005 mm | Lotus +41 mm |
| Height | 1369 mm | 1459 mm | Lotus +90 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 3069 mm | Lotus +169 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi e-tron GT
Lotus Emeya
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi e-tron GT
Lotus Emeya
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment F
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Lotus Emeya have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Audi e-tron GT?
The Lotus Emeya carries 98.9 kWh and covers 610 km, while the Audi e-tron GT with its 97 kWh battery does 622 km. Energy use decides it: 20.4 against 17.8 kWh/100 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Lotus Emeya takes more: 509 l against 405 l in the Audi e-tron GT. The difference is 104 l.
Which charges faster?
The Audi e-tron GT accepts up to 320 kW DC, the Lotus Emeya up to 403 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 18 and 14 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Audi e-tron GT uses less electricity: 17.8 kWh/100 km against 20.4 kWh/100 km in the Lotus Emeya. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 390 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.