Audi e-tron GT vs Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé
Biggest differences: Power — Audi e-tron GT 503 PS, Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé 367 PS · WLTP range — Audi e-tron GT 622 km, Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé 809 km · Consumption — Audi e-tron GT 17.8 kWh/100 km, Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé 15.6 kWh/100 km.
Audi e-tron GT
The Audi e-tron GT is an all-electric sedan in the F segment, offering all-wheel drive and high-performance powertrains.
Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé
The Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé is a luxury sedan in the F segment offering three powertrain variants with power ranging from 367 horsepower to 721 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Audi e-tron GT vs Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé
Audi e-tron GTquattro
Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door CoupéGT 53 4MATIC+
Audi e-tron GT or Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé — who wins where
Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé leads 7 to 3
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé +187 km
- Battery kWhMercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé +9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé −2.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi e-tron GT +136 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé −0.1 s
- Top speed km/hAudi e-tron GT +15 km/h
- DC charging kWMercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé +30 kW
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minMercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé −2 min
- Weight ↓ kgAudi e-tron GT −95 kg
- Boot lMercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé +10 l
Technical data: Audi e-tron GT vs Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi e-tron GT quattro | Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé GT 53 4MATIC+ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 622 km | 809 km | Mercedes +187 km |
| Battery | 97 kWh | 106 kWh | Mercedes +9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.8 kWh/100 km | 15.6 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −2.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 320 kW | 350 kW | Mercedes +30 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | — | — |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 18 min | 16 min | Mercedes −2 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 24.2 km/min | 35.4 km/min | Mercedes +11.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 503 PS | 367 PS | Audi +136 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4 s | 3.9 s | Mercedes −0.1 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 230 km/h | Audi +15 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2280 kg | 2375 kg | Audi −95 kg |
| Boot | 405 l | 415 l | Mercedes +10 l |
| Length | 4997 mm | 5094 mm | Mercedes +97 mm |
| Width | 1964 mm | 1959 mm | Audi +5 mm |
| Height | 1369 mm | 1411 mm | Mercedes +42 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 3040 mm | Mercedes +140 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi e-tron GT
Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi e-tron GT
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment F
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi e-tron GT or Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé?
The Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé goes further: 809 km WLTP against the 622 km of the Audi e-tron GT. That is a difference of 187 km.
Which is more powerful — Audi e-tron GT or Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé?
The Audi e-tron GT is stronger: 503 PS against the 367 PS of the Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé. The gap is 136 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Audi e-tron GT accepts up to 320 kW DC, the Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé up to 350 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 18 and 16 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé uses less electricity: 15.6 kWh/100 km against 17.8 kWh/100 km in the Audi e-tron GT. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 330 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.