Audi e-tron GT vs Porsche Taycan
Porsche Taycan leads 4 to 3
Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — Audi e-tron GT 4 s, Porsche Taycan 4.8 s · Power — Audi e-tron GT 503 PS, Porsche Taycan 435 PS · WLTP range — Audi e-tron GT 622 km, Porsche Taycan 700 km.
Audi e-tron GT
The Audi e-tron GT is an all-electric sedan in the F segment, offering all-wheel drive and high-performance powertrains.
Porsche Taycan
The Porsche Taycan is an E-segment sedan: for model year 2027 in 11 versions, WLTP range from 555 to 700 km, power from 408 to 789 hp and DC charging up to 320 kW.
Profile against the market: Audi e-tron GT vs Porsche Taycan
Audi e-tron GTquattro- Porsche TaycanPerformance Battery Plus · 2027 model year
Audi e-tron GT or Porsche Taycan — who wins where
Porsche Taycan leads 4 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPorsche Taycan +78 km
- Battery kWhNo difference
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmPorsche Taycan −1.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi e-tron GT +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi e-tron GT −0.8 s
- Top speed km/hAudi e-tron GT +15 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgPorsche Taycan −110 kg
- Boot lPorsche Taycan +2 l
Technical data: Audi e-tron GT vs Porsche Taycan
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi e-tron GT quattro | Porsche Taycan Performance Battery Plus · 2027 model year | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 622 km | 700 km | Porsche +78 km |
| Battery | 97 kWh | 97 kWh | No difference |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.8 kWh/100 km | 16.4 kWh/100 km | Porsche −1.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 320 kW | 320 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 18 min | 18 min | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 24.2 km/min | 27.2 km/min | Porsche +3 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 503 PS | 435 PS | Audi +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4 s | 4.8 s | Audi −0.8 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 230 km/h | Audi +15 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2280 kg | 2170 kg | Porsche −110 kg |
| Boot | 405 l | 407 l | Porsche +2 l |
| Length | 4997 mm | 4963 mm | Audi +34 mm |
| Width | 1964 mm | 1966 mm | Porsche +2 mm |
| Height | 1369 mm | 1379 mm | Porsche +10 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 2900 mm | No difference |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi e-tron GT
Porsche Taycan
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi e-tron GT
Porsche Taycan
Other comparisons in this class
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi e-tron GT or Porsche Taycan?
The Porsche Taycan goes further: 700 km WLTP against the 622 km of the Audi e-tron GT. That is a difference of 78 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi e-tron GT and the Porsche Taycan differ?
The Audi e-tron GT has AWD and 503 PS. The Porsche Taycan has RWD and 435 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Audi e-tron GT accepts up to 320 kW DC, the Porsche Taycan up to 320 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 18 and 18 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Porsche Taycan uses less electricity: 16.4 kWh/100 km against 17.8 kWh/100 km in the Audi e-tron GT. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 210 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.