Audi e-tron GT vs Polestar 5
Biggest differences: Power — Audi e-tron GT 503 PS, Polestar 5 748 PS · Charging 10–80% — Audi e-tron GT 18 min, Polestar 5 22 min · Battery — Audi e-tron GT 97 kWh, Polestar 5 112 kWh.
Audi e-tron GT
The Audi e-tron GT is an all-electric sedan in the F segment, offering all-wheel drive and high-performance powertrains.
Polestar 5
An electric sedan in the F-segment class, offering high-powered engines and fast DC charging capabilities.
Profile against the market: Audi e-tron GT vs Polestar 5
Audi e-tron GTquattro
Polestar 5Dual Motor
Audi e-tron GT or Polestar 5 — who wins where
Polestar 5 leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPolestar 5 +56 km
- Battery kWhPolestar 5 +15 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi e-tron GT −1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSPolestar 5 +245 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sPolestar 5 −0.1 s
- Top speed km/hPolestar 5 +5 km/h
- DC charging kWPolestar 5 +30 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minAudi e-tron GT −4 min
- Weight ↓ kgAudi e-tron GT −220 kg
- Boot lAudi e-tron GT +40 l
Technical data: Audi e-tron GT vs Polestar 5
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi e-tron GT quattro | Polestar 5 Dual Motor | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 622 km | 678 km | Polestar +56 km |
| Battery | 97 kWh | 112 kWh | Polestar +15 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.8 kWh/100 km | 18.8 kWh/100 km | Audi −1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 320 kW | 350 kW | Polestar +30 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 18 min | 22 min | Audi −4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 24.2 km/min | 21.6 km/min | Audi +2.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 503 PS | 748 PS | Polestar +245 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4 s | 3.9 s | Polestar −0.1 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 250 km/h | Polestar +5 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2280 kg | 2500 kg | Audi −220 kg |
| Boot | 405 l | 365 l | Audi +40 l |
| Length | 4997 mm | 5087 mm | Polestar +90 mm |
| Width | 1964 mm | 1960 mm | Audi +4 mm |
| Height | 1369 mm | 1449 mm | Polestar +80 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 3080 mm | Polestar +180 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi e-tron GT
Polestar 5
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi e-tron GT
Polestar 5
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment F
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi e-tron GT or Polestar 5?
The Polestar 5 goes further: 678 km WLTP against the 622 km of the Audi e-tron GT. That is a difference of 56 km.
Which is more powerful — Audi e-tron GT or Polestar 5?
The Polestar 5 is stronger: 748 PS against the 503 PS of the Audi e-tron GT. The gap is 245 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Audi e-tron GT accepts up to 320 kW DC, the Polestar 5 up to 350 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 18 and 22 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Audi e-tron GT uses less electricity: 17.8 kWh/100 km against 18.8 kWh/100 km in the Polestar 5. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 150 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.