Audi e-tron GT vs Tesla Model S
Biggest differences: Boot — Audi e-tron GT 405 l, Tesla Model S 793 l · Power — Audi e-tron GT 503 PS, Tesla Model S 670 PS · DC charging — Audi e-tron GT 320 kW, Tesla Model S 250 kW.
Audi e-tron GT
The Audi e-tron GT is an all-electric sedan in the F segment, offering all-wheel drive and high-performance powertrains.
Tesla Model S
The Tesla Model S is a sedan in the F segment, offering two all-wheel drive (AWD) variants with high performance and long range.
Profile against the market: Audi e-tron GT vs Tesla Model S
Audi e-tron GTquattro
Tesla Model SDual Motor AWD
Audi e-tron GT or Tesla Model S — who wins where
Tesla Model S leads 8 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmTesla Model S +12 km
- Battery kWhTesla Model S +3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmTesla Model S −3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSTesla Model S +167 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sTesla Model S −0.8 s
- Top speed km/hTesla Model S +5 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi e-tron GT +70 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgTesla Model S −211 kg
- Boot lTesla Model S +388 l
Technical data: Audi e-tron GT vs Tesla Model S
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi e-tron GT quattro | Tesla Model S Dual Motor AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 622 km | 634 km | Tesla +12 km |
| Battery | 97 kWh | 100 kWh | Tesla +3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.8 kWh/100 km | 14.8 kWh/100 km | Tesla −3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 320 kW | 250 kW | Audi +70 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 18 min | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | 24.2 km/min | — | — |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Audi +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 503 PS | 670 PS | Tesla +167 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4 s | 3.2 s | Tesla −0.8 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 250 km/h | Tesla +5 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2280 kg | 2069 kg | Tesla −211 kg |
| Boot | 405 l | 793 l | Tesla +388 l |
| Length | 4997 mm | 5021 mm | Tesla +24 mm |
| Width | 1964 mm | 1987 mm | Tesla +23 mm |
| Height | 1369 mm | 1431 mm | Tesla +62 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 2960 mm | Tesla +60 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi e-tron GT
Tesla Model S
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi e-tron GT
Tesla Model S
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment F
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the bigger boot?
The Tesla Model S takes more: 793 l against 405 l in the Audi e-tron GT. The difference is 388 l.
Which charges faster?
The Audi e-tron GT accepts up to 320 kW DC, the Tesla Model S up to 250 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Tesla Model S uses less electricity: 14.8 kWh/100 km against 17.8 kWh/100 km in the Audi e-tron GT. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 450 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.