Lotus Emeya vs Tesla Model S

Biggest differences: AC charging — Lotus Emeya 22 kW, Tesla Model S 11 kW · DC charging — Lotus Emeya 403 kW, Tesla Model S 250 kW · Boot — Lotus Emeya 509 l, Tesla Model S 793 l.

Lotus Emeya

The Lotus Emeya is a sporty sedan in the F-segment, offering a long range in the GT version and extreme performance in the R version.

Tesla Model S

The Tesla Model S is a sedan in the F segment, offering two all-wheel drive (AWD) variants with high performance and long range.

Profile against the market: Lotus Emeya vs Tesla Model S

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Lotus Emeya or Tesla Model S — who wins where

Tesla Model S leads 7 to 2

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmTesla Model S +24 km
    Lotus Emeya
    610
    Tesla Model S
    634
  • Battery kWhTesla Model S +1.1 kWh
    Lotus Emeya
    98.9
    Tesla Model S
    100
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmTesla Model S −5.6 kWh/100 km
    Lotus Emeya
    20.4
    Tesla Model S
    14.8
  • Power PSTesla Model S +58 PS
    Lotus Emeya
    612
    Tesla Model S
    670
  • 0–100 km/h sTesla Model S −1 s
    Lotus Emeya
    4.15
    Tesla Model S
    3.2
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Lotus Emeya
    250
    Tesla Model S
    250
  • DC charging kWLotus Emeya +153 kW
    Lotus Emeya
    403
    Tesla Model S
    250
  • AC charging kWLotus Emeya +11 kW
    Lotus Emeya
    22
    Tesla Model S
    11
  • Charging minNo data
    Lotus Emeya
    14
    Tesla Model S
  • Weight kgTesla Model S −421 kg
    Lotus Emeya
    2490
    Tesla Model S
    2069
  • Boot lTesla Model S +284 l
    Lotus Emeya
    509
    Tesla Model S
    793

Add a third car

Technical data: Lotus Emeya vs Tesla Model S

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Lotus Emeya vs Tesla Model S
Key parameters Lotus Emeya
GT
Tesla Model S
Dual Motor AWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range610 km634 kmTesla +24 km
Battery98.9 kWh100 kWhTesla +1.1 kWh
Consumption20.4 kWh/100 km14.8 kWh/100 kmTesla −5.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging403 kW250 kWLotus +153 kW
AC charging22 kW11 kWLotus +11 kW
Charging 10–80%14 min
Range per minute of charging30.5 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VLotus +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power612 PS670 PSTesla +58 PS
0–100 km/h4.15 s3.2 sTesla −1 s
Top speed250 km/h250 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainAWDAWD
Practicality
Weight2490 kg2069 kgTesla −421 kg
Boot509 l793 lTesla +284 l
Length5139 mm5021 mmLotus +118 mm
Width2005 mm1987 mmLotus +18 mm
Height1459 mm1431 mmLotus +28 mm
Wheelbase3069 mm2960 mmLotus +109 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Lotus Emeya

Cost per 100 km6.12
Monthly76
Yearly918

Tesla Model S

Cost per 100 km4.44
Monthly56
Yearly666

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Lotus Emeya

Tesla Model S

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment F

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Lotus Emeya or Tesla Model S?

The Tesla Model S goes further: 634 km WLTP against the 610 km of the Lotus Emeya. That is a difference of 24 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Tesla Model S takes more: 793 l against 509 l in the Lotus Emeya. The difference is 284 l.

Which charges faster?

The Lotus Emeya accepts up to 403 kW DC, the Tesla Model S up to 250 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Tesla Model S uses less electricity: 14.8 kWh/100 km against 20.4 kWh/100 km in the Lotus Emeya. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 840 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.