Lotus Emeya vs Polestar 5

Biggest differences: AC charging — Lotus Emeya 22 kW, Polestar 5 11 kW · Charging 10–80% — Lotus Emeya 14 min, Polestar 5 22 min · Boot — Lotus Emeya 509 l, Polestar 5 365 l.

Lotus Emeya

The Lotus Emeya is a sporty sedan in the F-segment, offering a long range in the GT version and extreme performance in the R version.

Polestar 5

An electric sedan in the F-segment class, offering high-powered engines and fast DC charging capabilities.

Profile against the market: Lotus Emeya vs Polestar 5

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Lotus Emeya or Polestar 5 — who wins where

It's a tie: 5 to 5

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmPolestar 5 +68 km
    Lotus Emeya
    610
    Polestar 5
    678
  • Battery kWhPolestar 5 +13.1 kWh
    Lotus Emeya
    98.9
    Polestar 5
    112
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmPolestar 5 −1.6 kWh/100 km
    Lotus Emeya
    20.4
    Polestar 5
    18.8
  • Power PSPolestar 5 +136 PS
    Lotus Emeya
    612
    Polestar 5
    748
  • 0–100 km/h sPolestar 5 −0.3 s
    Lotus Emeya
    4.15
    Polestar 5
    3.9
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Lotus Emeya
    250
    Polestar 5
    250
  • DC charging kWLotus Emeya +53 kW
    Lotus Emeya
    403
    Polestar 5
    350
  • AC charging kWLotus Emeya +11 kW
    Lotus Emeya
    22
    Polestar 5
    11
  • Charging minLotus Emeya −8 min
    Lotus Emeya
    14
    Polestar 5
    22
  • Weight kgLotus Emeya −10 kg
    Lotus Emeya
    2490
    Polestar 5
    2500
  • Boot lLotus Emeya +144 l
    Lotus Emeya
    509
    Polestar 5
    365

Add a third car

Technical data: Lotus Emeya vs Polestar 5

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Lotus Emeya vs Polestar 5
Key parameters Lotus Emeya
GT
Polestar 5
Dual Motor
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range610 km678 kmPolestar +68 km
Battery98.9 kWh112 kWhPolestar +13.1 kWh
Consumption20.4 kWh/100 km18.8 kWh/100 kmPolestar −1.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging403 kW350 kWLotus +53 kW
AC charging22 kW11 kWLotus +11 kW
Charging 10–80%14 min22 minLotus −8 min
Range per minute of charging30.5 km/min21.6 km/minLotus +8.9 km/min
Voltage800 V800 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power612 PS748 PSPolestar +136 PS
0–100 km/h4.15 s3.9 sPolestar −0.3 s
Top speed250 km/h250 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainAWDAWD
Practicality
Weight2490 kg2500 kgLotus −10 kg
Boot509 l365 lLotus +144 l
Length5139 mm5087 mmLotus +52 mm
Width2005 mm1960 mmLotus +45 mm
Height1459 mm1449 mmLotus +10 mm
Wheelbase3069 mm3080 mmPolestar +11 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Lotus Emeya

Cost per 100 km6.12
Monthly76
Yearly918

Polestar 5

Cost per 100 km5.64
Monthly71
Yearly846

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Lotus Emeya

Polestar 5

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment F

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Lotus Emeya or Polestar 5?

The Polestar 5 goes further: 678 km WLTP against the 610 km of the Lotus Emeya. That is a difference of 68 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Lotus Emeya takes more: 509 l against 365 l in the Polestar 5. The difference is 144 l.

Which charges faster?

The Lotus Emeya accepts up to 403 kW DC, the Polestar 5 up to 350 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 14 and 22 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Polestar 5 uses less electricity: 18.8 kWh/100 km against 20.4 kWh/100 km in the Lotus Emeya. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 240 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.