Lotus Emeya vs Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé
Biggest differences: Power — Lotus Emeya 612 PS, Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé 367 PS · WLTP range — Lotus Emeya 610 km, Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé 809 km · Consumption — Lotus Emeya 20.4 kWh/100 km, Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé 15.6 kWh/100 km.
Lotus Emeya
The Lotus Emeya is a sporty sedan in the F-segment, offering a long range in the GT version and extreme performance in the R version.
Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé
The Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé is a luxury sedan in the F segment offering three powertrain variants with power ranging from 367 horsepower to 721 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Lotus Emeya vs Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé
Lotus EmeyaGT
Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door CoupéGT 53 4MATIC+
Lotus Emeya or Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé — who wins where
It's a tie: 5 to 5
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé +199 km
- Battery kWhMercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé +7.1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé −4.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSLotus Emeya +245 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé −0.3 s
- Top speed km/hLotus Emeya +20 km/h
- DC charging kWLotus Emeya +53 kW
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minLotus Emeya −2 min
- Weight ↓ kgMercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé −115 kg
- Boot lLotus Emeya +94 l
Technical data: Lotus Emeya vs Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Lotus Emeya GT | Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé GT 53 4MATIC+ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 610 km | 809 km | Mercedes +199 km |
| Battery | 98.9 kWh | 106 kWh | Mercedes +7.1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 20.4 kWh/100 km | 15.6 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −4.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 403 kW | 350 kW | Lotus +53 kW |
| AC charging | 22 kW | — | — |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 14 min | 16 min | Lotus −2 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 30.5 km/min | 35.4 km/min | Mercedes +4.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 612 PS | 367 PS | Lotus +245 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.15 s | 3.9 s | Mercedes −0.3 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h | 230 km/h | Lotus +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2490 kg | 2375 kg | Mercedes −115 kg |
| Boot | 509 l | 415 l | Lotus +94 l |
| Length | 5139 mm | 5094 mm | Lotus +45 mm |
| Width | 2005 mm | 1959 mm | Lotus +46 mm |
| Height | 1459 mm | 1411 mm | Lotus +48 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3069 mm | 3040 mm | Lotus +29 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Lotus Emeya
Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Lotus Emeya
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment F
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Lotus Emeya or Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé?
The Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé goes further: 809 km WLTP against the 610 km of the Lotus Emeya. That is a difference of 199 km.
Which is more powerful — Lotus Emeya or Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé?
The Lotus Emeya is stronger: 612 PS against the 367 PS of the Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé. The gap is 245 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Lotus Emeya takes more: 509 l against 415 l in the Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé. The difference is 94 l.
Which charges faster?
The Lotus Emeya accepts up to 403 kW DC, the Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé up to 350 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 14 and 16 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.