Polestar 5 vs Tesla Model S

Biggest differences: Boot — Polestar 5 365 l, Tesla Model S 793 l · DC charging — Polestar 5 350 kW, Tesla Model S 250 kW · Consumption — Polestar 5 18.8 kWh/100 km, Tesla Model S 14.8 kWh/100 km.

Polestar 5

An electric sedan in the F-segment class, offering high-powered engines and fast DC charging capabilities.

Tesla Model S

The Tesla Model S is a sedan in the F segment, offering two all-wheel drive (AWD) variants with high performance and long range.

Profile against the market: Polestar 5 vs Tesla Model S

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Polestar 5 or Tesla Model S — who wins where

It's a tie: 4 to 4

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmPolestar 5 +44 km
    Polestar 5
    678
    Tesla Model S
    634
  • Battery kWhPolestar 5 +12 kWh
    Polestar 5
    112
    Tesla Model S
    100
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmTesla Model S −4 kWh/100 km
    Polestar 5
    18.8
    Tesla Model S
    14.8
  • Power PSPolestar 5 +78 PS
    Polestar 5
    748
    Tesla Model S
    670
  • 0–100 km/h sTesla Model S −0.7 s
    Polestar 5
    3.9
    Tesla Model S
    3.2
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Polestar 5
    250
    Tesla Model S
    250
  • DC charging kWPolestar 5 +100 kW
    Polestar 5
    350
    Tesla Model S
    250
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Polestar 5
    11
    Tesla Model S
    11
  • Charging minNo data
    Polestar 5
    22
    Tesla Model S
  • Weight kgTesla Model S −431 kg
    Polestar 5
    2500
    Tesla Model S
    2069
  • Boot lTesla Model S +428 l
    Polestar 5
    365
    Tesla Model S
    793

Add a third car

Technical data: Polestar 5 vs Tesla Model S

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Polestar 5 vs Tesla Model S
Key parameters Polestar 5
Dual Motor
Tesla Model S
Dual Motor AWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range678 km634 kmPolestar +44 km
Battery112 kWh100 kWhPolestar +12 kWh
Consumption18.8 kWh/100 km14.8 kWh/100 kmTesla −4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging350 kW250 kWPolestar +100 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%22 min
Range per minute of charging21.6 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VPolestar +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power748 PS670 PSPolestar +78 PS
0–100 km/h3.9 s3.2 sTesla −0.7 s
Top speed250 km/h250 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainAWDAWD
Practicality
Weight2500 kg2069 kgTesla −431 kg
Boot365 l793 lTesla +428 l
Length5087 mm5021 mmPolestar +66 mm
Width1960 mm1987 mmTesla +27 mm
Height1449 mm1431 mmPolestar +18 mm
Wheelbase3080 mm2960 mmPolestar +120 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Polestar 5

Cost per 100 km5.64
Monthly71
Yearly846

Tesla Model S

Cost per 100 km4.44
Monthly56
Yearly666

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Polestar 5

Tesla Model S

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment F

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Polestar 5 or Tesla Model S?

The Polestar 5 goes further: 678 km WLTP against the 634 km of the Tesla Model S. That is a difference of 44 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Tesla Model S takes more: 793 l against 365 l in the Polestar 5. The difference is 428 l.

Which charges faster?

The Polestar 5 accepts up to 350 kW DC, the Tesla Model S up to 250 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Tesla Model S uses less electricity: 14.8 kWh/100 km against 18.8 kWh/100 km in the Polestar 5. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 600 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.