Škoda Peaq vs Volvo EX60 Cross Country
Volvo EX60 Cross Country leads 6 to 4
Biggest differences: DC charging — Škoda Peaq 199 kW, Volvo EX60 Cross Country 400 kW · AC charging — Škoda Peaq 11 kW, Volvo EX60 Cross Country 22 kW · Boot — Škoda Peaq 935 l, Volvo EX60 Cross Country 523 l.
Škoda Peaq
The Škoda Peaq is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three drive variants with ranges reaching up to 647 km according to the WLTP standard.
Volvo EX60 Cross Country
The Volvo EX60 Cross Country is a D-segment SUV offering two all-wheel drive variants and high performance.
Profile against the market: Škoda Peaq vs Volvo EX60 Cross Country
Škoda Peaq90
Volvo EX60 Cross CountryP10 AWD
Škoda Peaq or Volvo EX60 Cross Country — who wins where
Volvo EX60 Cross Country leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmŠkoda Peaq +7 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EX60 Cross Country +4 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Peaq −1.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX60 Cross Country +224 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX60 Cross Country −2.4 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWVolvo EX60 Cross Country +201 kW
- AC charging kWVolvo EX60 Cross Country +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minVolvo EX60 Cross Country −10 min
- Weight ↓ kgŠkoda Peaq −61 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Peaq +412 l
Technical data: Škoda Peaq vs Volvo EX60 Cross Country
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Škoda Peaq 90 | Volvo EX60 Cross Country P10 AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 647 km | 640 km | Škoda +7 km |
| Battery | 86 kWh | 90 kWh | Volvo +4 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15 kWh/100 km | 16.2 kWh/100 km | Škoda −1.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 199 kW | 400 kW | Volvo +201 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Volvo +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 28 min | 18 min | Volvo −10 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 16.2 km/min | 24.9 km/min | Volvo +8.7 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Volvo +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 510 PS | Volvo +224 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.1 s | 4.7 s | Volvo −2.4 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2234 kg | 2295 kg | Škoda −61 kg |
| Boot | 935 l | 523 l | Škoda +412 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4874 mm | 4803 mm | Škoda +71 mm |
| Width | 1867 mm | 1899 mm | Volvo +32 mm |
| Height | 1664 mm | 1635 mm | Škoda +29 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2965 mm | 2970 mm | Volvo +5 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Škoda Peaq
Volvo EX60 Cross Country
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Škoda Peaq
Volvo EX60 Cross Country
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Volvo EX60 Cross Country have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Škoda Peaq?
The Volvo EX60 Cross Country carries 90 kWh and covers 640 km, while the Škoda Peaq with its 86 kWh battery does 647 km. Energy use decides it: 16.2 against 15 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Škoda Peaq and the Volvo EX60 Cross Country differ?
The Škoda Peaq has RWD and 286 PS. The Volvo EX60 Cross Country has AWD and 510 PS.
Which is more powerful — Škoda Peaq or Volvo EX60 Cross Country?
The Volvo EX60 Cross Country is stronger: 510 PS against the 286 PS of the Škoda Peaq. The gap is 224 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Škoda Peaq takes more: 935 l against 523 l in the Volvo EX60 Cross Country. The difference is 412 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.