BMW iX4 vs Volvo EX60 Cross Country
Volvo EX60 Cross Country leads 6 to 4
Biggest differences: AC charging — BMW iX4 11 kW, Volvo EX60 Cross Country 22 kW · WLTP range — BMW iX4 828 km, Volvo EX60 Cross Country 640 km · Battery — BMW iX4 108.7 kWh, Volvo EX60 Cross Country 90 kWh.
BMW iX4
The BMW iX4 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment with all-wheel drive (AWD): it offers power outputs ranging from 374 to 469 horsepower, a range of up to 828 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 400 kW.
Volvo EX60 Cross Country
The Volvo EX60 Cross Country is a D-segment SUV offering two all-wheel drive variants and high performance.
Profile against the market: BMW iX4 vs Volvo EX60 Cross Country
BMW iX450 xDrive
Volvo EX60 Cross CountryP10 AWD
BMW iX4 or Volvo EX60 Cross Country — who wins where
Volvo EX60 Cross Country leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmBMW iX4 +188 km
- Battery kWhBMW iX4 +18.7 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX4 −0.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX60 Cross Country +41 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX60 Cross Country −0.2 s
- Top speed km/hBMW iX4 +30 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWVolvo EX60 Cross Country +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minVolvo EX60 Cross Country −3 min
- Weight ↓ kgVolvo EX60 Cross Country −10 kg
- Boot lVolvo EX60 Cross Country +33 l
Technical data: BMW iX4 vs Volvo EX60 Cross Country
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BMW iX4 50 xDrive | Volvo EX60 Cross Country P10 AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 828 km | 640 km | BMW +188 km |
| Battery | 108.7 kWh | 90 kWh | BMW +18.7 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.7 kWh/100 km | 16.2 kWh/100 km | BMW −0.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 400 kW | 400 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Volvo +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 21 min | 18 min | Volvo −3 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 27.6 km/min | 24.9 km/min | BMW +2.7 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 469 PS | 510 PS | Volvo +41 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.9 s | 4.7 s | Volvo −0.2 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | BMW +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2305 kg | 2295 kg | Volvo −10 kg |
| Boot | 490 l | 523 l | Volvo +33 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4782 mm | 4803 mm | Volvo +21 mm |
| Width | 1895 mm | 1899 mm | Volvo +4 mm |
| Height | 1595 mm | 1635 mm | Volvo +40 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2897 mm | 2970 mm | Volvo +73 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BMW iX4
Volvo EX60 Cross Country
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Volvo EX60 Cross Country
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BMW iX4 or Volvo EX60 Cross Country?
The BMW iX4 goes further: 828 km WLTP against the 640 km of the Volvo EX60 Cross Country. That is a difference of 188 km.
Which charges faster?
The BMW iX4 accepts up to 400 kW DC, the Volvo EX60 Cross Country up to 400 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 21 and 18 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The BMW iX4 uses less electricity: 15.7 kWh/100 km against 16.2 kWh/100 km in the Volvo EX60 Cross Country. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 75 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.