SERES 3 vs Xpeng L03
Biggest differences: WLTP range — SERES 3 300 km, Xpeng L03 520 km · Power — SERES 3 160 PS, Xpeng L03 245 PS · 0–100 km/h — SERES 3 8.9 s, Xpeng L03 6.6 s.
SERES 3
The electric SUV belongs to the C-segment and is equipped with front-wheel drive and a 54 kWh battery.
Xpeng L03
The Xpeng L03 is a compact SUV available in three different powertrain and battery capacity configurations, offering fast DC charging capabilities.
Profile against the market: SERES 3 vs Xpeng L03
SERES 3 or Xpeng L03 — who wins where
Xpeng L03 leads 7 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmXpeng L03 +220 km
- Battery kWhXpeng L03 +17.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmXpeng L03 −1.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSXpeng L03 +85 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sXpeng L03 −2.3 s
- Top speed km/hXpeng L03 +25 km/h
- DC charging kWNo data
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgSERES 3 −175 kg
- Boot lXpeng L03 +49 l
Technical data: SERES 3 vs Xpeng L03
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  SERES 3Standard |  Xpeng L03Long Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 300 km | 520 km | Xpeng +220 km |
| Battery | 54 kWh | 71.2 kWh | Xpeng +17.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.6 kWh/100 km | 16 kWh/100 km | Xpeng −1.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | — | 236 kW | — |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 20 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 18.2 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 160 PS | 245 PS | Xpeng +85 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.9 s | 6.6 s | Xpeng −2.3 s |
| Top speed | 155 km/h | 180 km/h | Xpeng +25 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1765 kg | 1940 kg | SERES −175 kg |
| Boot | 318 l | 367 l | Xpeng +49 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Xpeng |
| Length | 4415 mm | 4650 mm | Xpeng +235 mm |
| Width | 1850 mm | 1920 mm | Xpeng +70 mm |
| Height | 1650 mm | 1600 mm | SERES +50 mm |
| Wheelbase | — | 2850 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
SERES 3
Xpeng L03
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — SERES 3 or Xpeng L03?
The Xpeng L03 goes further: 520 km WLTP against the 300 km of the SERES 3. That is a difference of 220 km.
How do the drivetrains of the SERES 3 and the Xpeng L03 differ?
The SERES 3 has FWD and 160 PS. The Xpeng L03 has RWD and 245 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Xpeng L03 — its 71.2 kWh battery then works as a power source. The SERES 3, with 54 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — SERES 3 or Xpeng L03?
The Xpeng L03 is stronger: 245 PS against the 160 PS of the SERES 3. The gap is 85 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.