Renault Megane E-Tech vs SERES 3
Biggest differences: WLTP range — Renault Megane E-Tech 500 km, SERES 3 300 km · Boot — Renault Megane E-Tech 440 l, SERES 3 318 l · Power — Renault Megane E-Tech 218 PS, SERES 3 160 PS.
Renault Megane E-Tech
An electric crossover in the C-segment, offering a range of up to 500 km and fast charging (DC).
SERES 3
The electric SUV belongs to the C-segment and is equipped with front-wheel drive and a 54 kWh battery.
Profile against the market: Renault Megane E-Tech vs SERES 3
Renault Megane E-TechComfort Range 67 kWh
SERES 3Standard
Renault Megane E-Tech or SERES 3 — who wins where
Renault Megane E-Tech leads 7 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmRenault Megane E-Tech +200 km
- Battery kWhRenault Megane E-Tech +13 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmRenault Megane E-Tech −1.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSRenault Megane E-Tech +58 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sRenault Megane E-Tech −1.3 s
- Top speed km/hRenault Megane E-Tech +5 km/h
- DC charging kWNo data
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgSERES 3 −7 kg
- Boot lRenault Megane E-Tech +122 l
Technical data: Renault Megane E-Tech vs SERES 3
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Renault Megane E-Tech Comfort Range 67 kWh | SERES 3 Standard | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 500 km | 300 km | Renault +200 km |
| Battery | 67 kWh | 54 kWh | Renault +13 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.7 kWh/100 km | 17.6 kWh/100 km | Renault −1.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | — | — |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 15–80% ↓ | 24 min | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | 13.5 km/min | — | — |
| Voltage | 400 V | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 160 PS | Renault +58 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.6 s | 8.9 s | Renault −1.3 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 155 km/h | Renault +5 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1772 kg | 1765 kg | SERES −7 kg |
| Boot | 440 l | 318 l | Renault +122 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Renault |
| Length | 4200 mm | 4415 mm | SERES +215 mm |
| Width | 1768 mm | 1850 mm | SERES +82 mm |
| Height | 1522 mm | 1650 mm | SERES +128 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2685 mm | — | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Renault Megane E-Tech
SERES 3
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Renault Megane E-Tech
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Renault Megane E-Tech or SERES 3?
The Renault Megane E-Tech goes further: 500 km WLTP against the 300 km of the SERES 3. That is a difference of 200 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Renault Megane E-Tech — its 67 kWh battery then works as a power source. The SERES 3, with 54 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Renault Megane E-Tech or SERES 3?
The Renault Megane E-Tech is stronger: 218 PS against the 160 PS of the SERES 3. The gap is 58 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Renault Megane E-Tech takes more: 440 l against 318 l in the SERES 3. The difference is 122 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.