Porsche Cayenne Electric vs Volvo EX90
Biggest differences: Boot — Porsche Cayenne Electric 781 l, Volvo EX90 324 l · 0–100 km/h — Porsche Cayenne Electric 3.8 s, Volvo EX90 5.5 s · Top speed — Porsche Cayenne Electric 250 km/h, Volvo EX90 180 km/h.
Porsche Cayenne Electric
The Porsche Cayenne Electric is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering three powertrain options with power ranging from 408 horsepower to 857 horsepower.
Volvo EX90
The Volvo EX90 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering three powertrain options with power ranging from 333 horsepower to 680 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Porsche Cayenne Electric vs Volvo EX90
- Porsche Cayenne ElectricS Electric
Volvo EX90Twin Motor
Porsche Cayenne Electric or Volvo EX90 — who wins where
Porsche Cayenne Electric leads 9 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPorsche Cayenne Electric +28 km
- Battery kWhPorsche Cayenne Electric +7 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmVolvo EX90 −0.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSPorsche Cayenne Electric +88 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sPorsche Cayenne Electric −1.7 s
- Top speed km/hPorsche Cayenne Electric +70 km/h
- DC charging kWPorsche Cayenne Electric +50 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minPorsche Cayenne Electric −6 min
- Weight ↓ kgPorsche Cayenne Electric −135 kg
- Boot lPorsche Cayenne Electric +457 l
Technical data: Porsche Cayenne Electric vs Volvo EX90
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Porsche Cayenne Electric S Electric | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 653 km | 625 km | Porsche +28 km |
| Battery | 113 kWh | 106 kWh | Porsche +7 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 19.5 kWh/100 km | 19.4 kWh/100 km | Volvo −0.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 400 kW | 350 kW | Porsche +50 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 16 min | 22 min | Porsche −6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 28.6 km/min | 19.9 km/min | Porsche +8.7 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 544 PS | 456 PS | Porsche +88 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 3.8 s | 5.5 s | Porsche −1.7 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h | 180 km/h | Porsche +70 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2555 kg | 2690 kg | Porsche −135 kg |
| Boot | 781 l | 324 l | Porsche +457 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Volvo |
| Length | 4991 mm | 5037 mm | Volvo +46 mm |
| Width | 1980 mm | 1964 mm | Porsche +16 mm |
| Height | 1674 mm | 1744 mm | Volvo +70 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3023 mm | 2985 mm | Porsche +38 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Porsche Cayenne Electric
Volvo EX90
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Porsche Cayenne Electric
Volvo EX90
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Porsche Cayenne Electric or Volvo EX90?
The Porsche Cayenne Electric goes further: 653 km WLTP against the 625 km of the Volvo EX90. That is a difference of 28 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Volvo EX90 — its 106 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Porsche Cayenne Electric, with 113 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Porsche Cayenne Electric takes more: 781 l against 324 l in the Volvo EX90. The difference is 457 l.
Which charges faster?
The Porsche Cayenne Electric accepts up to 400 kW DC, the Volvo EX90 up to 350 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 16 and 22 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.