Nissan Micra vs Renault 5 E-Tech
Renault 5 E-Tech leads 4 to 0
Biggest differences: Consumption — Nissan Micra 14.7 kWh/100 km, Renault 5 E-Tech 14.2 kWh/100 km · WLTP range — Nissan Micra 416 km, Renault 5 E-Tech 430 km.
Nissan Micra
The Nissan Micra (Model Year 2026) is a compact, segment B hatchback available with two different range and power configurations, offering front-wheel drive.
Renault 5 E-Tech
The Renault 5 E-Tech is an all-electric hatchback in the B segment, featuring front-wheel drive (FWD): it offers power outputs ranging from 95 to 150 horsepower, a range of up to 430 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 100 kW.
Profile against the market: Nissan Micra vs Renault 5 E-Tech
Nissan Micra52 kWh
Renault 5 E-TechComfort Range 150
Nissan Micra or Renault 5 E-Tech — who wins where
Renault 5 E-Tech leads 4 to 0
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmRenault 5 E-Tech +14 km
- Battery kWhNo difference
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmRenault 5 E-Tech −0.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sRenault 5 E-Tech −0.1 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgRenault 5 E-Tech −3 kg
- Boot lNo difference
Technical data: Nissan Micra vs Renault 5 E-Tech
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Nissan Micra 52 kWh | Renault 5 E-Tech Comfort Range 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 416 km | 430 km | Renault +14 km |
| Battery | 52 kWh | 52 kWh | No difference |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.7 kWh/100 km | 14.2 kWh/100 km | Renault −0.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 15–80% ↓ | 30 min | 30 min | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 9 km/min | 9.3 km/min | Renault +0.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 150 PS | 150 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8 s | 7.9 s | Renault −0.1 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 150 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1452 kg | 1449 kg | Renault −3 kg |
| Boot | 326 l | 326 l | No difference |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 3974 mm | 3922 mm | Nissan +52 mm |
| Width | 1774 mm | 1774 mm | No difference |
| Height | 1499 mm | 1498 mm | Nissan +1 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2541 mm | 2540 mm | Nissan +1 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Nissan Micra
Renault 5 E-Tech
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Nissan Micra
Renault 5 E-Tech
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Nissan Micra or Renault 5 E-Tech?
The Renault 5 E-Tech goes further: 430 km WLTP against the 416 km of the Nissan Micra. That is a difference of 14 km.
Which charges faster?
The Nissan Micra accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Renault 5 E-Tech up to 100 kW. Charging from 15 to 80% takes 30 and 30 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Renault 5 E-Tech uses less electricity: 14.2 kWh/100 km against 14.7 kWh/100 km in the Nissan Micra. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 75 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.