Peugeot e-208 vs Renault 5 E-Tech
Renault 5 E-Tech leads 5 to 2
Biggest differences: Boot — Peugeot e-208 309 l, Renault 5 E-Tech 326 l · Consumption — Peugeot e-208 14.9 kWh/100 km, Renault 5 E-Tech 14.2 kWh/100 km · Power — Peugeot e-208 156 PS, Renault 5 E-Tech 150 PS.
Peugeot e-208
Peugeot e-208 is a B-segment hatchback in three variants: WLTP range from 361 to 433 km, power from 136 to 281 hp.
Renault 5 E-Tech
The Renault 5 E-Tech is an all-electric hatchback in the B segment, featuring front-wheel drive (FWD): it offers power outputs ranging from 95 to 150 horsepower, a range of up to 430 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 100 kW.
Profile against the market: Peugeot e-208 vs Renault 5 E-Tech
Peugeot e-208GT 156
Renault 5 E-TechComfort Range 150
Peugeot e-208 or Renault 5 E-Tech — who wins where
Renault 5 E-Tech leads 5 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot e-208 +3 km
- Battery kWhRenault 5 E-Tech +1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmRenault 5 E-Tech −0.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSPeugeot e-208 +6 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sRenault 5 E-Tech −0.3 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgRenault 5 E-Tech −6 kg
- Boot lRenault 5 E-Tech +17 l
Technical data: Peugeot e-208 vs Renault 5 E-Tech
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Peugeot e-208 GT 156 | Renault 5 E-Tech Comfort Range 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 433 km | 430 km | Peugeot +3 km |
| Battery | 51 kWh | 52 kWh | Renault +1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.9 kWh/100 km | 14.2 kWh/100 km | Renault −0.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 35 min 0–80% | 30 min 15–80% | 5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 9.9 km/min | 9.3 km/min | Peugeot +0.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 156 PS | 150 PS | Peugeot +6 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.2 s | 7.9 s | Renault −0.3 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 150 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1455 kg | 1449 kg | Renault −6 kg |
| Boot | 309 l | 326 l | Renault +17 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4055 mm | 3922 mm | Peugeot +133 mm |
| Width | 1745 mm | 1774 mm | Renault +29 mm |
| Height | 1430 mm | 1498 mm | Renault +68 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2540 mm | 2540 mm | No difference |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Peugeot e-208
Renault 5 E-Tech
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Peugeot e-208
Renault 5 E-Tech
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Renault 5 E-Tech have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Peugeot e-208?
The Renault 5 E-Tech carries 52 kWh and covers 430 km, while the Peugeot e-208 with its 51 kWh battery does 433 km. Energy use decides it: 14.2 against 14.9 kWh/100 km.
Which charges faster?
The Peugeot e-208 accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Renault 5 E-Tech up to 100 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Renault 5 E-Tech uses less electricity: 14.2 kWh/100 km against 14.9 kWh/100 km in the Peugeot e-208. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 105 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.