Nio Firefly vs Peugeot e-208
Biggest differences: Boot — Nio Firefly 404 l, Peugeot e-208 265 l · WLTP range — Nio Firefly 330 km, Peugeot e-208 433 km · Battery — Nio Firefly 42.1 kWh, Peugeot e-208 51 kWh.
Nio Firefly
The Nio Firefly is a compact hatchback with rear-wheel drive, offering a range of 330 km in the WLTP cycle.
Peugeot e-208
The Peugeot e-208 is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offered with three different powertrain options, each offering varying power outputs and battery capacities.
Profile against the market: Nio Firefly vs Peugeot e-208
Nio Firefly42.1 kWh RWD
Peugeot e-208GT 156
Nio Firefly or Peugeot e-208 — who wins where
Peugeot e-208 leads 4 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot e-208 +103 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot e-208 +8.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNio Firefly −0.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSPeugeot e-208 +13 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNio Firefly −0.1 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgPeugeot e-208 −12 kg
- Boot lNio Firefly +139 l
Technical data: Nio Firefly vs Peugeot e-208
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Nio Firefly 42.1 kWh RWD | Peugeot e-208 GT 156 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 330 km | 433 km | Peugeot +103 km |
| Battery | 42.1 kWh | 51 kWh | Peugeot +8.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.5 kWh/100 km | 14.9 kWh/100 km | Nio −0.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 29 min 10–80% | 35 min 0–80% | 6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 8 km/min | 9.9 km/min | Peugeot +1.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 143 PS | 156 PS | Peugeot +13 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.1 s | 8.2 s | Nio −0.1 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 150 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1467 kg | 1455 kg | Peugeot −12 kg |
| Boot | 404 l | 265 l | Nio +139 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4003 mm | 4055 mm | Peugeot +52 mm |
| Width | 1885 mm | 1745 mm | Nio +140 mm |
| Height | 1557 mm | 1430 mm | Nio +127 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2615 mm | 2540 mm | Nio +75 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Nio Firefly
Peugeot e-208
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Nio Firefly
Peugeot e-208
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Nio Firefly or Peugeot e-208?
The Peugeot e-208 goes further: 433 km WLTP against the 330 km of the Nio Firefly. That is a difference of 103 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Nio Firefly and the Peugeot e-208 differ?
The Nio Firefly has RWD and 143 PS. The Peugeot e-208 has FWD and 156 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Nio Firefly takes more: 404 l against 265 l in the Peugeot e-208. The difference is 139 l.
Which charges faster?
The Nio Firefly accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Peugeot e-208 up to 100 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.