JAC E30X vs Nio Firefly
Biggest differences: DC charging — JAC E30X 64 kW, Nio Firefly 100 kW · Boot — JAC E30X 310 l, Nio Firefly 404 l · Battery — JAC E30X 51.5 kWh, Nio Firefly 42.1 kWh.
JAC E30X
The JAC E30X is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offering two battery options and corresponding ranges, all with the same powertrain output.
Nio Firefly
The Nio Firefly is a compact hatchback with rear-wheel drive, offering a range of 330 km in the WLTP cycle.
Profile against the market: JAC E30X vs Nio Firefly
- JAC E30XNordic Edition 50
Nio Firefly42.1 kWh RWD
JAC E30X or Nio Firefly — who wins where
It's a tie: 4 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmJAC E30X +44 km
- Battery kWhJAC E30X +9.4 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNio Firefly −1.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNio Firefly +7 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sJAC E30X −0.3 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWNio Firefly +36 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgJAC E30X −22 kg
- Boot lNio Firefly +94 l
Technical data: JAC E30X vs Nio Firefly
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | JAC E30X Nordic Edition 50 | Nio Firefly 42.1 kWh RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 374 km | 330 km | JAC +44 km |
| Battery | 51.5 kWh | 42.1 kWh | JAC +9.4 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.6 kWh/100 km | 14.5 kWh/100 km | Nio −1.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 64 kW | 100 kW | Nio +36 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 45 min 30–80% | 29 min 10–80% | 16 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 4.2 km/min | 8 km/min | Nio +3.8 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 136 PS | 143 PS | Nio +7 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.8 s | 8.1 s | JAC −0.3 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 150 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1445 kg | 1467 kg | JAC −22 kg |
| Boot | 310 l | 404 l | Nio +94 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Nio |
| Length | 4025 mm | 4003 mm | JAC +22 mm |
| Width | 1770 mm | 1885 mm | Nio +115 mm |
| Height | 1560 mm | 1557 mm | JAC +3 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2620 mm | 2615 mm | JAC +5 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
JAC E30X
Nio Firefly
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
JAC E30X
Nio Firefly
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — JAC E30X or Nio Firefly?
The JAC E30X goes further: 374 km WLTP against the 330 km of the Nio Firefly. That is a difference of 44 km.
How do the drivetrains of the JAC E30X and the Nio Firefly differ?
The JAC E30X has FWD and 136 PS. The Nio Firefly has RWD and 143 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Nio Firefly — its 42.1 kWh battery then works as a power source. The JAC E30X, with 51.5 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Nio Firefly takes more: 404 l against 310 l in the JAC E30X. The difference is 94 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.