Alpine A290 vs JAC E30X
Biggest differences: DC charging — Alpine A290 100 kW, JAC E30X 64 kW · Power — Alpine A290 180 PS, JAC E30X 136 PS · Top speed — Alpine A290 160 km/h, JAC E30X 150 km/h.
Alpine A290
This electric hatchback in the B-segment offers two power options, both with the same WLTP range of 380 kilometers.
JAC E30X
The JAC E30X is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offering two battery options and corresponding ranges, all with the same powertrain output.
Profile against the market: Alpine A290 vs JAC E30X
Alpine A290GT- JAC E30XNordic Edition 50
Alpine A290 or JAC E30X — who wins where
Alpine A290 leads 7 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAlpine A290 +6 km
- Battery kWhAlpine A290 +0.5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmJAC E30X −0.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAlpine A290 +44 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAlpine A290 −0.4 s
- Top speed km/hAlpine A290 +10 km/h
- DC charging kWAlpine A290 +36 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgJAC E30X −38 kg
- Boot lAlpine A290 +16 l
Technical data: Alpine A290 vs JAC E30X
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Alpine A290 GT | JAC E30X Nordic Edition 50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 380 km | 374 km | Alpine +6 km |
| Battery | 52 kWh | 51.5 kWh | Alpine +0.5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.8 kWh/100 km | 15.6 kWh/100 km | JAC −0.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 64 kW | Alpine +36 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 30 min 15–80% | 45 min 30–80% | 15 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 8.2 km/min | 4.2 km/min | Alpine +4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 180 PS | 136 PS | Alpine +44 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.4 s | 7.8 s | Alpine −0.4 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 150 km/h | Alpine +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1483 kg | 1445 kg | JAC −38 kg |
| Boot | 326 l | 310 l | Alpine +16 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Alpine |
| Length | 3997 mm | 4025 mm | JAC +28 mm |
| Width | 1823 mm | 1770 mm | Alpine +53 mm |
| Height | 1512 mm | 1560 mm | JAC +48 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2534 mm | 2620 mm | JAC +86 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Alpine A290
JAC E30X
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Alpine A290
JAC E30X
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Alpine A290 — its 52 kWh battery then works as a power source. The JAC E30X, with 51.5 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Alpine A290 accepts up to 100 kW DC, the JAC E30X up to 64 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.