Peugeot e-208 vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
Volkswagen ID. Polo leads 8 to 1
Biggest differences: Boot — Peugeot e-208 309 l, Volkswagen ID. Polo 441 l · Power — Peugeot e-208 156 PS, Volkswagen ID. Polo 211 PS · 0–100 km/h — Peugeot e-208 8.2 s, Volkswagen ID. Polo 7.1 s.
Peugeot e-208
Peugeot e-208 is a B-segment hatchback in three variants: WLTP range from 361 to 433 km, power from 136 to 281 hp.
Volkswagen ID. Polo
Volkswagen ID. Polo is a B-segment hatchback in four variants: WLTP range from 329 to 454 km, power from 116 to 226 hp.
Profile against the market: Peugeot e-208 vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
Peugeot e-208GT 156
Volkswagen ID. Polo52 kWh 155 kW
Peugeot e-208 or Volkswagen ID. Polo — who wins where
Volkswagen ID. Polo leads 8 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolkswagen ID. Polo +21 km
- Battery kWhVolkswagen ID. Polo +1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmVolkswagen ID. Polo −1.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolkswagen ID. Polo +55 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolkswagen ID. Polo −1.1 s
- Top speed km/hVolkswagen ID. Polo +10 km/h
- DC charging kWVolkswagen ID. Polo +5 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgPeugeot e-208 −121 kg
- Boot lVolkswagen ID. Polo +132 l
Technical data: Peugeot e-208 vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Peugeot e-208 GT 156 | Volkswagen ID. Polo 52 kWh 155 kW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 433 km | 454 km | Volkswagen +21 km |
| Battery | 51 kWh | 52 kWh | Volkswagen +1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.9 kWh/100 km | 13.3 kWh/100 km | Volkswagen −1.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 105 kW | Volkswagen +5 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 35 min 0–80% | 24 min 10–80% | 11 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 9.9 km/min | 13.2 km/min | Volkswagen +3.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 156 PS | 211 PS | Volkswagen +55 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.2 s | 7.1 s | Volkswagen −1.1 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 160 km/h | Volkswagen +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1455 kg | 1576 kg | Peugeot −121 kg |
| Boot | 309 l | 441 l | Volkswagen +132 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4055 mm | 4053 mm | Peugeot +2 mm |
| Width | 1745 mm | 1816 mm | Volkswagen +71 mm |
| Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm | Volkswagen +100 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2540 mm | 2600 mm | Volkswagen +60 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Peugeot e-208
Volkswagen ID. Polo
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Peugeot e-208
Volkswagen ID. Polo
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Peugeot e-208 or Volkswagen ID. Polo?
The Volkswagen ID. Polo goes further: 454 km WLTP against the 433 km of the Peugeot e-208. That is a difference of 21 km.
Which is more powerful — Peugeot e-208 or Volkswagen ID. Polo?
The Volkswagen ID. Polo is stronger: 211 PS against the 156 PS of the Peugeot e-208. The gap is 55 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Volkswagen ID. Polo takes more: 441 l against 309 l in the Peugeot e-208. The difference is 132 l.
Which charges faster?
The Peugeot e-208 accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Volkswagen ID. Polo up to 105 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.