Renault 5 E-Tech vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
Biggest differences: Power — Renault 5 E-Tech 150 PS, Volkswagen ID. Polo 211 PS · Boot — Renault 5 E-Tech 326 l, Volkswagen ID. Polo 441 l · Consumption — Renault 5 E-Tech 14.9 kWh/100 km, Volkswagen ID. Polo 13.3 kWh/100 km.
Renault 5 E-Tech
The Renault 5 E-Tech is a city hatchback in the B segment, offered with three different powertrain options, each offering varying power outputs and battery capacities.
Volkswagen ID. Polo
The Volkswagen ID. Polo is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offered with three powertrain configurations featuring different ranges and performance levels.
Profile against the market: Renault 5 E-Tech vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
Renault 5 E-TechComfort Range 150
Volkswagen ID. Polo52 kWh 155 kW
Renault 5 E-Tech or Volkswagen ID. Polo — who wins where
Volkswagen ID. Polo leads 7 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolkswagen ID. Polo +44 km
- Battery kWhNo difference
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmVolkswagen ID. Polo −1.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolkswagen ID. Polo +61 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolkswagen ID. Polo −0.5 s
- Top speed km/hVolkswagen ID. Polo +10 km/h
- DC charging kWVolkswagen ID. Polo +5 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgRenault 5 E-Tech −107 kg
- Boot lVolkswagen ID. Polo +115 l
Technical data: Renault 5 E-Tech vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Renault 5 E-Tech Comfort Range 150 | Volkswagen ID. Polo 52 kWh 155 kW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 410 km | 454 km | Volkswagen +44 km |
| Battery | 52 kWh | 52 kWh | No difference |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.9 kWh/100 km | 13.3 kWh/100 km | Volkswagen −1.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 105 kW | Volkswagen +5 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 30 min 15–80% | 24 min 10–80% | 6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 8.9 km/min | 13.2 km/min | Volkswagen +4.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 150 PS | 211 PS | Volkswagen +61 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 7.4 s | Volkswagen −0.5 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 160 km/h | Volkswagen +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1469 kg | 1576 kg | Renault −107 kg |
| Boot | 326 l | 441 l | Volkswagen +115 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 3922 mm | 4053 mm | Volkswagen +131 mm |
| Width | 1774 mm | 1816 mm | Volkswagen +42 mm |
| Height | 1498 mm | 1530 mm | Volkswagen +32 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2540 mm | 2600 mm | Volkswagen +60 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Renault 5 E-Tech
Volkswagen ID. Polo
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Renault 5 E-Tech
Volkswagen ID. Polo
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Renault 5 E-Tech or Volkswagen ID. Polo?
The Volkswagen ID. Polo goes further: 454 km WLTP against the 410 km of the Renault 5 E-Tech. That is a difference of 44 km.
Which is more powerful — Renault 5 E-Tech or Volkswagen ID. Polo?
The Volkswagen ID. Polo is stronger: 211 PS against the 150 PS of the Renault 5 E-Tech. The gap is 61 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Volkswagen ID. Polo takes more: 441 l against 326 l in the Renault 5 E-Tech. The difference is 115 l.
Which charges faster?
The Renault 5 E-Tech accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Volkswagen ID. Polo up to 105 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.