Nissan Micra vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
Volkswagen ID. Polo leads 7 to 1
Biggest differences: Power — Nissan Micra 150 PS, Volkswagen ID. Polo 211 PS · Boot — Nissan Micra 326 l, Volkswagen ID. Polo 441 l · 0–100 km/h — Nissan Micra 8 s, Volkswagen ID. Polo 7.1 s.
Nissan Micra
The Nissan Micra (Model Year 2026) is a compact, segment B hatchback available with two different range and power configurations, offering front-wheel drive.
Volkswagen ID. Polo
Volkswagen ID. Polo is a B-segment hatchback in four variants: WLTP range from 329 to 454 km, power from 116 to 226 hp.
Profile against the market: Nissan Micra vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
Nissan Micra52 kWh
Volkswagen ID. Polo52 kWh 155 kW
Nissan Micra or Volkswagen ID. Polo — who wins where
Volkswagen ID. Polo leads 7 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolkswagen ID. Polo +38 km
- Battery kWhNo difference
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmVolkswagen ID. Polo −1.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolkswagen ID. Polo +61 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolkswagen ID. Polo −0.9 s
- Top speed km/hVolkswagen ID. Polo +10 km/h
- DC charging kWVolkswagen ID. Polo +5 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgNissan Micra −124 kg
- Boot lVolkswagen ID. Polo +115 l
Technical data: Nissan Micra vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Nissan Micra 52 kWh | Volkswagen ID. Polo 52 kWh 155 kW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 416 km | 454 km | Volkswagen +38 km |
| Battery | 52 kWh | 52 kWh | No difference |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.7 kWh/100 km | 13.3 kWh/100 km | Volkswagen −1.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 105 kW | Volkswagen +5 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 30 min 15–80% | 24 min 10–80% | 6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 9 km/min | 13.2 km/min | Volkswagen +4.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 150 PS | 211 PS | Volkswagen +61 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8 s | 7.1 s | Volkswagen −0.9 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 160 km/h | Volkswagen +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1452 kg | 1576 kg | Nissan −124 kg |
| Boot | 326 l | 441 l | Volkswagen +115 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 3974 mm | 4053 mm | Volkswagen +79 mm |
| Width | 1774 mm | 1816 mm | Volkswagen +42 mm |
| Height | 1499 mm | 1530 mm | Volkswagen +31 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2541 mm | 2600 mm | Volkswagen +59 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Nissan Micra
Volkswagen ID. Polo
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Nissan Micra
Volkswagen ID. Polo
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Nissan Micra or Volkswagen ID. Polo?
The Volkswagen ID. Polo goes further: 454 km WLTP against the 416 km of the Nissan Micra. That is a difference of 38 km.
Which is more powerful — Nissan Micra or Volkswagen ID. Polo?
The Volkswagen ID. Polo is stronger: 211 PS against the 150 PS of the Nissan Micra. The gap is 61 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Volkswagen ID. Polo takes more: 441 l against 326 l in the Nissan Micra. The difference is 115 l.
Which charges faster?
The Nissan Micra accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Volkswagen ID. Polo up to 105 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.