Lancia Ypsilon vs Nissan Micra
Biggest differences: AC charging — Lancia Ypsilon 7.4 kW, Nissan Micra 11 kW · 0–100 km/h — Lancia Ypsilon 9 s, Nissan Micra 8 s · Weight — Lancia Ypsilon 1561 kg, Nissan Micra 1452 kg.
Lancia Ypsilon
The Lancia Ypsilon is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offered with two electric powertrain configurations offering different power outputs and performance characteristics.
Nissan Micra
The Nissan Micra (Model Year 2026) is a compact, segment B hatchback available with two different range and power configurations, offering front-wheel drive.
Profile against the market: Lancia Ypsilon vs Nissan Micra
Lancia YpsilonElectric
Nissan Micra52 kWh
Lancia Ypsilon or Nissan Micra — who wins where
Nissan Micra leads 5 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLancia Ypsilon +9 km
- Battery kWhNissan Micra +1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmLancia Ypsilon −0.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSLancia Ypsilon +6 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNissan Micra −1 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNissan Micra +3.6 kW
- Weight ↓ kgNissan Micra −109 kg
- Boot lNissan Micra +17 l
Technical data: Lancia Ypsilon vs Nissan Micra
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Lancia Ypsilon Electric | Nissan Micra 52 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 425 km | 416 km | Lancia +9 km |
| Battery | 51 kWh | 52 kWh | Nissan +1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.4 kWh/100 km | 14.7 kWh/100 km | Lancia −0.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 7.4 kW | 11 kW | Nissan +3.6 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 28 min 10–80% | 30 min 15–80% | 2 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 10.6 km/min | 9 km/min | Lancia +1.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 156 PS | 150 PS | Lancia +6 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 9 s | 8 s | Nissan −1 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 150 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1561 kg | 1452 kg | Nissan −109 kg |
| Boot | 309 l | 326 l | Nissan +17 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Nissan |
| Length | 4080 mm | 3974 mm | Lancia +106 mm |
| Width | 1768 mm | 1774 mm | Nissan +6 mm |
| Height | 1440 mm | 1499 mm | Nissan +59 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2545 mm | 2541 mm | Lancia +4 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Lancia Ypsilon
Nissan Micra
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Lancia Ypsilon
Nissan Micra
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Lancia Ypsilon or Nissan Micra?
The Lancia Ypsilon goes further: 425 km WLTP against the 416 km of the Nissan Micra. That is a difference of 9 km.
Why does the Nissan Micra have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Lancia Ypsilon?
The Nissan Micra carries 52 kWh and covers 416 km, while the Lancia Ypsilon with its 51 kWh battery does 425 km. Energy use decides it: 14.7 against 14.4 kWh/100 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Nissan Micra — its 52 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Lancia Ypsilon, with 51 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Lancia Ypsilon accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Nissan Micra up to 100 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.