Lancia Ypsilon vs Renault 5 E-Tech

Renault 5 E-Tech leads 7 to 1

Biggest differences: AC charging — Lancia Ypsilon 7.4 kW, Renault 5 E-Tech 11 kW · 0–100 km/h — Lancia Ypsilon 9 s, Renault 5 E-Tech 7.9 s · Weight — Lancia Ypsilon 1561 kg, Renault 5 E-Tech 1449 kg.

Lancia Ypsilon

The Lancia Ypsilon is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offered with two electric powertrain configurations offering different power outputs and performance characteristics.

Renault 5 E-Tech

The Renault 5 E-Tech is an all-electric hatchback in the B segment, featuring front-wheel drive (FWD): it offers power outputs ranging from 95 to 150 horsepower, a range of up to 430 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 100 kW.

Profile against the market: Lancia Ypsilon vs Renault 5 E-Tech

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Lancia Ypsilon or Renault 5 E-Tech — who wins where

Renault 5 E-Tech leads 7 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmRenault 5 E-Tech +5 km
    Lancia Ypsilon
    425
    Renault 5 E-Tech
    430
  • Battery kWhRenault 5 E-Tech +1 kWh
    Lancia Ypsilon
    51
    Renault 5 E-Tech
    52
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmRenault 5 E-Tech −0.2 kWh/100 km
    Lancia Ypsilon
    14.4
    Renault 5 E-Tech
    14.2
  • Power PSLancia Ypsilon +6 PS
    Lancia Ypsilon
    156
    Renault 5 E-Tech
    150
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sRenault 5 E-Tech −1.1 s
    Lancia Ypsilon
    9
    Renault 5 E-Tech
    7.9
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Lancia Ypsilon
    150
    Renault 5 E-Tech
    150
  • DC charging kWNo difference
    Lancia Ypsilon
    100
    Renault 5 E-Tech
    100
  • AC charging kWRenault 5 E-Tech +3.6 kW
    Lancia Ypsilon
    7.4
    Renault 5 E-Tech
    11
  • Weight ↓ kgRenault 5 E-Tech −112 kg
    Lancia Ypsilon
    1561
    Renault 5 E-Tech
    1449
  • Boot lRenault 5 E-Tech +17 l
    Lancia Ypsilon
    309
    Renault 5 E-Tech
    326

Add a third car

Technical data: Lancia Ypsilon vs Renault 5 E-Tech

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Lancia Ypsilon vs Renault 5 E-Tech
Key parameters Lancia Ypsilon
Electric
Renault 5 E-Tech
Comfort Range 150
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range425 km430 kmRenault +5 km
Battery51 kWh52 kWhRenault +1 kWh
Consumption ↓14.4 kWh/100 km14.2 kWh/100 kmRenault −0.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW100 kWNo difference
AC charging7.4 kW11 kWRenault +3.6 kW
Charging ⚠28 min 10–80%30 min 15–80%2 min
Range per minute of charging10.6 km/min9.3 km/minLancia +1.3 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power156 PS150 PSLancia +6 PS
0–100 km/h ↓9 s7.9 sRenault −1.1 s
Top speed150 km/h150 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainFWDFWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓1561 kg1449 kgRenault −112 kg
Boot309 l326 lRenault +17 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Renault
Length4080 mm3922 mmLancia +158 mm
Width1768 mm1774 mmRenault +6 mm
Height1440 mm1498 mmRenault +58 mm
Wheelbase2545 mm2540 mmLancia +5 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Lancia Ypsilon

Cost per 100 km4.32
Monthly54
Yearly648

Renault 5 E-Tech

Cost per 100 km4.26
Monthly53
Yearly639

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Lancia Ypsilon

Renault 5 E-Tech

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Renault 5 E-Tech — its 52 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Lancia Ypsilon, with 51 kWh, does not offer it.

Which charges faster?

The Lancia Ypsilon accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Renault 5 E-Tech up to 100 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.