Nio Firefly vs Nissan Micra
Biggest differences: WLTP range — Nio Firefly 330 km, Nissan Micra 416 km · Boot — Nio Firefly 404 l, Nissan Micra 326 l · Battery — Nio Firefly 42.1 kWh, Nissan Micra 52 kWh.
Nio Firefly
The Nio Firefly is a compact hatchback with rear-wheel drive, offering a range of 330 km in the WLTP cycle.
Nissan Micra
The Nissan Micra (Model Year 2026) is a compact, segment B hatchback available with two different range and power configurations, offering front-wheel drive.
Profile against the market: Nio Firefly vs Nissan Micra
Nio Firefly42.1 kWh RWD
Nissan Micra52 kWh
Nio Firefly or Nissan Micra — who wins where
Nissan Micra leads 5 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmNissan Micra +86 km
- Battery kWhNissan Micra +9.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNio Firefly −0.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNissan Micra +7 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNissan Micra −0.1 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgNissan Micra −15 kg
- Boot lNio Firefly +78 l
Technical data: Nio Firefly vs Nissan Micra
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Nio Firefly 42.1 kWh RWD | Nissan Micra 52 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 330 km | 416 km | Nissan +86 km |
| Battery | 42.1 kWh | 52 kWh | Nissan +9.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.5 kWh/100 km | 14.7 kWh/100 km | Nio −0.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 29 min 10–80% | 30 min 15–80% | 1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 8 km/min | 9 km/min | Nissan +1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 143 PS | 150 PS | Nissan +7 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.1 s | 8 s | Nissan −0.1 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 150 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1467 kg | 1452 kg | Nissan −15 kg |
| Boot | 404 l | 326 l | Nio +78 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4003 mm | 3974 mm | Nio +29 mm |
| Width | 1885 mm | 1774 mm | Nio +111 mm |
| Height | 1557 mm | 1499 mm | Nio +58 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2615 mm | 2541 mm | Nio +74 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Nio Firefly
Nissan Micra
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Nio Firefly
Nissan Micra
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Nio Firefly or Nissan Micra?
The Nissan Micra goes further: 416 km WLTP against the 330 km of the Nio Firefly. That is a difference of 86 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Nio Firefly and the Nissan Micra differ?
The Nio Firefly has RWD and 143 PS. The Nissan Micra has FWD and 150 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Nio Firefly takes more: 404 l against 326 l in the Nissan Micra. The difference is 78 l.
Which charges faster?
The Nio Firefly accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Nissan Micra up to 100 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.