Mazda 6e vs Togg T10F
Biggest differences: DC charging — Mazda 6e 90 kW, Togg T10F 180 kW · Boot — Mazda 6e 336 l, Togg T10F 505 l · Power — Mazda 6e 245 PS, Togg T10F 218 PS.
Mazda 6e
The Mazda 6e is an electric sedan in the D-segment, offering two rear-wheel drive (RWD) variants with different battery capacities and DC charging capabilities.
Togg T10F
The Togg T10F is a D-segment sedan offering rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive variants, with power ranging from 218 to 435 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Mazda 6e vs Togg T10F
Mazda 6e or Togg T10F — who wins where
Togg T10F leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmTogg T10F +58 km
- Battery kWhTogg T10F +8.5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMazda 6e −0.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMazda 6e +27 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sTogg T10F −0.3 s
- Top speed km/hMazda 6e +3 km/h
- DC charging kWTogg T10F +90 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgMazda 6e −117 kg
- Boot lTogg T10F +169 l
Technical data: Mazda 6e vs Togg T10F
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  Mazda 6eLong Range 80 kWh |  Togg T10FV1 RWD Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 552 km | 610 km | Togg +58 km |
| Battery | 80 kWh | 88.5 kWh | Togg +8.5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.5 kWh/100 km | 17.4 kWh/100 km | Mazda −0.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 90 kW | 180 kW | Togg +90 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 47 min 10–80% | 28 min 20–80% | 19 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 8.2 km/min | 13.1 km/min | Togg +4.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 245 PS | 218 PS | Mazda +27 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.8 s | 7.5 s | Togg −0.3 s |
| Top speed | 175 km/h | 172 km/h | Mazda +3 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1962 kg | 2079 kg | Mazda −117 kg |
| Boot | 336 l | 505 l | Togg +169 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4921 mm | 4830 mm | Mazda +91 mm |
| Width | 1890 mm | 1881 mm | Mazda +9 mm |
| Height | 1491 mm | 1553 mm | Togg +62 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2895 mm | 2890 mm | Mazda +5 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mazda 6e
Togg T10F
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Togg T10F
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Mazda 6e or Togg T10F?
The Togg T10F goes further: 610 km WLTP against the 552 km of the Mazda 6e. That is a difference of 58 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Togg T10F takes more: 505 l against 336 l in the Mazda 6e. The difference is 169 l.
Which charges faster?
The Mazda 6e accepts up to 90 kW DC, the Togg T10F up to 180 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Mazda 6e uses less electricity: 16.5 kWh/100 km against 17.4 kWh/100 km in the Togg T10F. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 135 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.