Tesla Model 3 vs Togg T10F
Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — Tesla Model 3 5.2 s, Togg T10F 7.5 s · DC charging — Tesla Model 3 250 kW, Togg T10F 180 kW · Consumption — Tesla Model 3 13.6 kWh/100 km, Togg T10F 17.4 kWh/100 km.
Tesla Model 3
The Tesla Model 3 is a sedan in the D-segment, offered with four different powertrain configurations, each offering varying ranges and performance characteristics.
Togg T10F
The Togg T10F is a D-segment sedan offering rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive variants, with power ranging from 218 to 435 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Tesla Model 3 vs Togg T10F
Tesla Model 3Premium RWD
Togg T10FV1 RWD Long Range
Tesla Model 3 or Togg T10F — who wins where
Tesla Model 3 leads 9 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmTesla Model 3 +140 km
- Battery kWhTogg T10F +9.5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmTesla Model 3 −3.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSTesla Model 3 +46 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sTesla Model 3 −2.3 s
- Top speed km/hTesla Model 3 +29 km/h
- DC charging kWTesla Model 3 +70 kW
- AC charging kWTesla Model 3 +0.5 kW
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgTesla Model 3 −332 kg
- Boot lTesla Model 3 +89 l
Technical data: Tesla Model 3 vs Togg T10F
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Tesla Model 3 Premium RWD | Togg T10F V1 RWD Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 750 km | 610 km | Tesla +140 km |
| Battery | 79 kWh | 88.5 kWh | Togg +9.5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.6 kWh/100 km | 17.4 kWh/100 km | Tesla −3.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 250 kW | 180 kW | Tesla +70 kW |
| AC charging | 11.5 kW | 11 kW | Tesla +0.5 kW |
| Charging 20–80% ↓ | — | 28 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 13.1 km/min | — |
| Voltage | 400 V | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 264 PS | 218 PS | Tesla +46 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 5.2 s | 7.5 s | Tesla −2.3 s |
| Top speed | 201 km/h | 172 km/h | Tesla +29 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1747 kg | 2079 kg | Tesla −332 kg |
| Boot | 594 l | 505 l | Tesla +89 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Togg |
| Length | 4720 mm | 4830 mm | Togg +110 mm |
| Width | 1850 mm | 1881 mm | Togg +31 mm |
| Height | 1440 mm | 1553 mm | Togg +113 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2875 mm | 2890 mm | Togg +15 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Tesla Model 3
Togg T10F
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Tesla Model 3
Togg T10F
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Tesla Model 3 or Togg T10F?
The Tesla Model 3 goes further: 750 km WLTP against the 610 km of the Togg T10F. That is a difference of 140 km.
Why does the Togg T10F have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Tesla Model 3?
The Togg T10F carries 88.5 kWh and covers 610 km, while the Tesla Model 3 with its 79 kWh battery does 750 km. Energy use decides it: 17.4 against 13.6 kWh/100 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Togg T10F — its 88.5 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Tesla Model 3, with 79 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Tesla Model 3 takes more: 594 l against 505 l in the Togg T10F. The difference is 89 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.