Nio ET5 vs Togg T10F

Biggest differences: Power — Nio ET5 489 PS, Togg T10F 218 PS · 0–100 km/h — Nio ET5 4 s, Togg T10F 7.5 s · DC charging — Nio ET5 125 kW, Togg T10F 180 kW.

Nio ET5

The Nio ET5 is a sedan in the D-segment, offering all-wheel drive and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in 4 seconds.

Togg T10F

The Togg T10F is a D-segment sedan offering rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive variants, with power ranging from 218 to 435 horsepower.

Profile against the market: Nio ET5 vs Togg T10F

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Nio ET5 or Togg T10F — who wins where

Togg T10F leads 5 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmTogg T10F +20 km
    Nio ET5
    590
    Togg T10F
    610
  • Battery kWhNio ET5 +11.5 kWh
    Nio ET5
    100
    Togg T10F
    88.5
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmTogg T10F −1.2 kWh/100 km
    Nio ET5
    18.6
    Togg T10F
    17.4
  • Power PSNio ET5 +271 PS
    Nio ET5
    489
    Togg T10F
    218
  • 0–100 km/h sNio ET5 −3.5 s
    Nio ET5
    4
    Togg T10F
    7.5
  • Top speed km/hNio ET5 +28 km/h
    Nio ET5
    200
    Togg T10F
    172
  • DC charging kWTogg T10F +55 kW
    Nio ET5
    125
    Togg T10F
    180
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Nio ET5
    11
    Togg T10F
    11
  • Weight kgTogg T10F −81 kg
    Nio ET5
    2160
    Togg T10F
    2079
  • Boot lTogg T10F +119 l
    Nio ET5
    386
    Togg T10F
    505

Add a third car

Technical data: Nio ET5 vs Togg T10F

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Nio ET5 vs Togg T10F
Key parameters Nio ET5
100 kWh
Togg T10F
V1 RWD Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range590 km610 kmTogg +20 km
Battery100 kWh88.5 kWhNio +11.5 kWh
Consumption18.6 kWh/100 km17.4 kWh/100 kmTogg −1.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging125 kW180 kWTogg +55 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 40 min 10–80%28 min 20–80%12 min
Range per minute of charging10.3 km/min13.1 km/minTogg +2.8 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power489 PS218 PSNio +271 PS
0–100 km/h4 s7.5 sNio −3.5 s
Top speed200 km/h172 km/hNio +28 km/h
DrivetrainAWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2160 kg2079 kgTogg −81 kg
Boot386 l505 lTogg +119 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4790 mm4830 mmTogg +40 mm
Width1960 mm1881 mmNio +79 mm
Height1499 mm1553 mmTogg +54 mm
Wheelbase2888 mm2890 mmTogg +2 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Nio ET5

Cost per 100 km5.58
Monthly70
Yearly837

Togg T10F

Cost per 100 km5.22
Monthly65
Yearly783

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Nio ET5

Togg T10F

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Nio ET5 or Togg T10F?

The Togg T10F goes further: 610 km WLTP against the 590 km of the Nio ET5. That is a difference of 20 km.

Why does the Nio ET5 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Togg T10F?

The Nio ET5 carries 100 kWh and covers 590 km, while the Togg T10F with its 88.5 kWh battery does 610 km. Energy use decides it: 18.6 against 17.4 kWh/100 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Nio ET5 and the Togg T10F differ?

The Nio ET5 has AWD and 489 PS. The Togg T10F has RWD and 218 PS.

Which is more powerful — Nio ET5 or Togg T10F?

The Nio ET5 is stronger: 489 PS against the 218 PS of the Togg T10F. The gap is 271 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.