BYD Seal vs Mazda 6e

BYD Seal leads 6 to 4

Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — BYD Seal 37 min, Mazda 6e 24 min · Boot — BYD Seal 485 l, Mazda 6e 336 l · DC charging — BYD Seal 150 kW, Mazda 6e 200 kW.

BYD Seal

The BYD Seal is a D-segment sedan in three variants, from 231 hp and 460 km of WLTP range to 530 hp with all-wheel drive.

Mazda 6e

The Mazda 6e is an electric sedan in the D segment, offering a range of up to 560 km and fast charging (DC) with a power of 200 kW.

Profile against the market: BYD Seal vs Mazda 6e

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BYD Seal or Mazda 6e — who wins where

BYD Seal leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBYD Seal +10 km
    BYD Seal
    570
    Mazda 6e
    560
  • Battery kWhBYD Seal +4.5 kWh
    BYD Seal
    82.5
    Mazda 6e
    78
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMazda 6e −0.5 kWh/100 km
    BYD Seal
    16.6
    Mazda 6e
    16.1
  • Power PSBYD Seal +55 PS
    BYD Seal
    313
    Mazda 6e
    258
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sBYD Seal −1.4 s
    BYD Seal
    5.9
    Mazda 6e
    7.3
  • Top speed km/hBYD Seal +5 km/h
    BYD Seal
    180
    Mazda 6e
    175
  • DC charging kWMazda 6e +50 kW
    BYD Seal
    150
    Mazda 6e
    200
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BYD Seal
    11
    Mazda 6e
    11
  • Charging ↓ minMazda 6e −13 min
    BYD Seal
    37
    Mazda 6e
    24
  • Weight ↓ kgMazda 6e −40 kg
    BYD Seal
    2055
    Mazda 6e
    2015
  • Boot lBYD Seal +149 l
    BYD Seal
    485
    Mazda 6e
    336

Add a third car

Technical data: BYD Seal vs Mazda 6e

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BYD Seal vs Mazda 6e
Key parameters BYD Seal
Design RWD
Mazda 6e
78 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range570 km560 kmBYD +10 km
Battery82.5 kWh78 kWhBYD +4.5 kWh
Consumption ↓16.6 kWh/100 km16.1 kWh/100 kmMazda −0.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging150 kW200 kWMazda +50 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓37 min24 minMazda −13 min
Range per minute of charging10.8 km/min16.3 km/minMazda +5.5 km/min
Voltage400 V——
Performance and drivetrain
Power313 PS258 PSBYD +55 PS
0–100 km/h ↓5.9 s7.3 sBYD −1.4 s
Top speed180 km/h175 km/hBYD +5 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓2055 kg2015 kgMazda −40 kg
Boot485 l336 lBYD +149 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly BYD
Length4800 mm4921 mmMazda +121 mm
Width1875 mm1890 mmMazda +15 mm
Height1460 mm1491 mmMazda +31 mm
Wheelbase2920 mm2895 mmBYD +25 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BYD Seal

Cost per 100 km4.98
Monthly62
Yearly747

Mazda 6e

Cost per 100 km4.83
Monthly60
Yearly725

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BYD Seal

Mazda 6e

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the BYD Seal — its 82.5 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mazda 6e, with 78 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The BYD Seal takes more: 485 l against 336 l in the Mazda 6e. The difference is 149 l.

Which charges faster?

The BYD Seal accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Mazda 6e up to 200 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 37 and 24 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Mazda 6e uses less electricity: 16.1 kWh/100 km against 16.6 kWh/100 km in the BYD Seal. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 75 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.