Mazda 6e vs Nio ET5

Nio ET5 leads 6 to 4

Biggest differences: Power — Mazda 6e 258 PS, Nio ET5 489 PS · 0–100 km/h — Mazda 6e 7.3 s, Nio ET5 4 s · Charging 10–80% — Mazda 6e 24 min, Nio ET5 40 min.

Mazda 6e

The Mazda 6e is an electric sedan in the D segment, offering a range of up to 560 km and fast charging (DC) with a power of 200 kW.

Nio ET5

The Nio ET5 is a sedan in the D-segment, offering all-wheel drive and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in 4 seconds.

Profile against the market: Mazda 6e vs Nio ET5

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Mazda 6e or Nio ET5 — who wins where

Nio ET5 leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmNio ET5 +30 km
    Mazda 6e
    560
    Nio ET5
    590
  • Battery kWhNio ET5 +22 kWh
    Mazda 6e
    78
    Nio ET5
    100
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMazda 6e −2.5 kWh/100 km
    Mazda 6e
    16.1
    Nio ET5
    18.6
  • Power PSNio ET5 +231 PS
    Mazda 6e
    258
    Nio ET5
    489
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sNio ET5 −3.3 s
    Mazda 6e
    7.3
    Nio ET5
    4
  • Top speed km/hNio ET5 +25 km/h
    Mazda 6e
    175
    Nio ET5
    200
  • DC charging kWMazda 6e +75 kW
    Mazda 6e
    200
    Nio ET5
    125
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Mazda 6e
    11
    Nio ET5
    11
  • Charging ↓ minMazda 6e −16 min
    Mazda 6e
    24
    Nio ET5
    40
  • Weight ↓ kgMazda 6e −145 kg
    Mazda 6e
    2015
    Nio ET5
    2160
  • Boot lNio ET5 +50 l
    Mazda 6e
    336
    Nio ET5
    386

Add a third car

Technical data: Mazda 6e vs Nio ET5

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Mazda 6e vs Nio ET5
Key parameters Mazda 6e
78 kWh
Nio ET5
100 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range560 km590 kmNio +30 km
Battery78 kWh100 kWhNio +22 kWh
Consumption ↓16.1 kWh/100 km18.6 kWh/100 kmMazda −2.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging200 kW125 kWMazda +75 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓24 min40 minMazda −16 min
Range per minute of charging16.3 km/min10.3 km/minMazda +6 km/min
Voltage—400 V—
Performance and drivetrain
Power258 PS489 PSNio +231 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7.3 s4 sNio −3.3 s
Top speed175 km/h200 km/hNio +25 km/h
DrivetrainRWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓2015 kg2160 kgMazda −145 kg
Boot336 l386 lNio +50 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Nio
Length4921 mm4790 mmMazda +131 mm
Width1890 mm1960 mmNio +70 mm
Height1491 mm1499 mmNio +8 mm
Wheelbase2895 mm2888 mmMazda +7 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Mazda 6e

Cost per 100 km4.83
Monthly60
Yearly725

Nio ET5

Cost per 100 km5.58
Monthly70
Yearly837

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Mazda 6e

Nio ET5

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Mazda 6e or Nio ET5?

The Nio ET5 goes further: 590 km WLTP against the 560 km of the Mazda 6e. That is a difference of 30 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Mazda 6e and the Nio ET5 differ?

The Mazda 6e has RWD and 258 PS. The Nio ET5 has AWD and 489 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Nio ET5 — its 100 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mazda 6e, with 78 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Mazda 6e or Nio ET5?

The Nio ET5 is stronger: 489 PS against the 258 PS of the Mazda 6e. The gap is 231 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.