Mazda 6e vs Tesla Model 3

Tesla Model 3 leads 10 to 0

Biggest differences: Boot — Mazda 6e 336 l, Tesla Model 3 594 l · 0–100 km/h — Mazda 6e 7.3 s, Tesla Model 3 5.2 s · WLTP range — Mazda 6e 560 km, Tesla Model 3 750 km.

Mazda 6e

The Mazda 6e is an electric sedan in the D segment, offering a range of up to 560 km and fast charging (DC) with a power of 200 kW.

Tesla Model 3

The Tesla Model 3 is a segment D sedan offered in four variants in the 2026 model year: WLTP range from 572 to 750 km, 0-100 km/h acceleration from 6.2 to 3.1 seconds.

Profile against the market: Mazda 6e vs Tesla Model 3

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Mazda 6e or Tesla Model 3 — who wins where

Tesla Model 3 leads 10 to 0

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmTesla Model 3 +190 km
    Mazda 6e
    560
    Tesla Model 3
    750
  • Battery kWhTesla Model 3 +1 kWh
    Mazda 6e
    78
    Tesla Model 3
    79
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmTesla Model 3 −2.5 kWh/100 km
    Mazda 6e
    16.1
    Tesla Model 3
    13.6
  • Power PSTesla Model 3 +6 PS
    Mazda 6e
    258
    Tesla Model 3
    264
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sTesla Model 3 −2.1 s
    Mazda 6e
    7.3
    Tesla Model 3
    5.2
  • Top speed km/hTesla Model 3 +26 km/h
    Mazda 6e
    175
    Tesla Model 3
    201
  • DC charging kWTesla Model 3 +50 kW
    Mazda 6e
    200
    Tesla Model 3
    250
  • AC charging kWTesla Model 3 +0.5 kW
    Mazda 6e
    11
    Tesla Model 3
    11.5
  • Charging ↓ minNo data
    Mazda 6e
    24
    Tesla Model 3
    —
  • Weight ↓ kgTesla Model 3 −268 kg
    Mazda 6e
    2015
    Tesla Model 3
    1747
  • Boot lTesla Model 3 +258 l
    Mazda 6e
    336
    Tesla Model 3
    594

Add a third car

Technical data: Mazda 6e vs Tesla Model 3

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Mazda 6e vs Tesla Model 3
Key parameters Mazda 6e
78 kWh
Tesla Model 3
Premium RWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range560 km750 kmTesla +190 km
Battery78 kWh79 kWhTesla +1 kWh
Consumption ↓16.1 kWh/100 km13.6 kWh/100 kmTesla −2.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging200 kW250 kWTesla +50 kW
AC charging11 kW11.5 kWTesla +0.5 kW
Charging 10–80% ↓24 min——
Range per minute of charging16.3 km/min——
Voltage—400 V—
Performance and drivetrain
Power258 PS264 PSTesla +6 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7.3 s5.2 sTesla −2.1 s
Top speed175 km/h201 km/hTesla +26 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓2015 kg1747 kgTesla −268 kg
Boot336 l594 lTesla +258 l
Length4921 mm4720 mmMazda +201 mm
Width1890 mm1850 mmMazda +40 mm
Height1491 mm1440 mmMazda +51 mm
Wheelbase2895 mm2875 mmMazda +20 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Mazda 6e

Cost per 100 km4.83
Monthly60
Yearly725

Tesla Model 3

Cost per 100 km4.08
Monthly51
Yearly612

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Mazda 6e

Tesla Model 3

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Mazda 6e or Tesla Model 3?

The Tesla Model 3 goes further: 750 km WLTP against the 560 km of the Mazda 6e. That is a difference of 190 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Tesla Model 3 takes more: 594 l against 336 l in the Mazda 6e. The difference is 258 l.

Which charges faster?

The Mazda 6e accepts up to 200 kW DC, the Tesla Model 3 up to 250 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Tesla Model 3 uses less electricity: 13.6 kWh/100 km against 16.1 kWh/100 km in the Mazda 6e. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 375 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.