Hyundai Ioniq 6 N vs Mazda 6e
Hyundai Ioniq 6 N leads 7 to 3
Biggest differences: Power — Hyundai Ioniq 6 N 609 PS, Mazda 6e 258 PS · 0–100 km/h — Hyundai Ioniq 6 N 3.4 s, Mazda 6e 7.3 s · Top speed — Hyundai Ioniq 6 N 257 km/h, Mazda 6e 175 km/h.
Hyundai Ioniq 6 N
A high-performance sports sedan in the D segment, featuring all-wheel drive and fast charging (DC).
Mazda 6e
The Mazda 6e is an electric sedan in the D segment, offering a range of up to 560 km and fast charging (DC) with a power of 200 kW.
Profile against the market: Hyundai Ioniq 6 N vs Mazda 6e
Hyundai Ioniq 6 NN
Mazda 6e78 kWh
Hyundai Ioniq 6 N or Mazda 6e — who wins where
Hyundai Ioniq 6 N leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMazda 6e +73 km
- Battery kWhHyundai Ioniq 6 N +6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMazda 6e −2.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSHyundai Ioniq 6 N +351 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sHyundai Ioniq 6 N −3.9 s
- Top speed km/hHyundai Ioniq 6 N +82 km/h
- DC charging kWHyundai Ioniq 6 N +60 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minHyundai Ioniq 6 N −6 min
- Weight ↓ kgMazda 6e −151 kg
- Boot lHyundai Ioniq 6 N +35 l
Technical data: Hyundai Ioniq 6 N vs Mazda 6e
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Hyundai Ioniq 6 N N | Mazda 6e 78 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 487 km | 560 km | Mazda +73 km |
| Battery | 84 kWh | 78 kWh | Hyundai +6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.7 kWh/100 km | 16.1 kWh/100 km | Mazda −2.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 260 kW | 200 kW | Hyundai +60 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 18 min | 24 min | Hyundai −6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 18.9 km/min | 16.3 km/min | Hyundai +2.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 609 PS | 258 PS | Hyundai +351 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 3.4 s | 7.3 s | Hyundai −3.9 s |
| Top speed | 257 km/h | 175 km/h | Hyundai +82 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2166 kg | 2015 kg | Mazda −151 kg |
| Boot | 371 l | 336 l | Hyundai +35 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Hyundai |
| Length | 4935 mm | 4921 mm | Hyundai +14 mm |
| Width | 1940 mm | 1890 mm | Hyundai +50 mm |
| Height | 1495 mm | 1491 mm | Hyundai +4 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2965 mm | 2895 mm | Hyundai +70 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Hyundai Ioniq 6 N
Mazda 6e
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Hyundai Ioniq 6 N
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Hyundai Ioniq 6 N or Mazda 6e?
The Mazda 6e goes further: 560 km WLTP against the 487 km of the Hyundai Ioniq 6 N. That is a difference of 73 km.
Why does the Hyundai Ioniq 6 N have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Mazda 6e?
The Hyundai Ioniq 6 N carries 84 kWh and covers 487 km, while the Mazda 6e with its 78 kWh battery does 560 km. Energy use decides it: 18.7 against 16.1 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Hyundai Ioniq 6 N and the Mazda 6e differ?
The Hyundai Ioniq 6 N has AWD and 609 PS. The Mazda 6e has RWD and 258 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Hyundai Ioniq 6 N — its 84 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mazda 6e, with 78 kWh, does not offer it.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.