Mercedes C EQ vs Togg T10F

Biggest differences: Power — Mercedes C EQ 489 PS, Togg T10F 218 PS · 0–100 km/h — Mercedes C EQ 4 s, Togg T10F 7.5 s · DC charging — Mercedes C EQ 330 kW, Togg T10F 180 kW.

Mercedes C EQ

An electric sedan in the D class, offering high performance with all-wheel drive and fast (DC) charging.

Togg T10F

The Togg T10F is a D-segment sedan offering rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive variants, with power ranging from 218 to 435 horsepower.

Profile against the market: Mercedes C EQ vs Togg T10F

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Mercedes C EQ or Togg T10F — who wins where

Mercedes C EQ leads 7 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmMercedes C EQ +152 km
    Mercedes C EQ
    762
    Togg T10F
    610
  • Battery kWhMercedes C EQ +5.5 kWh
    Mercedes C EQ
    94
    Togg T10F
    88.5
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmMercedes C EQ −3.1 kWh/100 km
    Mercedes C EQ
    14.3
    Togg T10F
    17.4
  • Power PSMercedes C EQ +271 PS
    Mercedes C EQ
    489
    Togg T10F
    218
  • 0–100 km/h sMercedes C EQ −3.5 s
    Mercedes C EQ
    4
    Togg T10F
    7.5
  • Top speed km/hMercedes C EQ +38 km/h
    Mercedes C EQ
    210
    Togg T10F
    172
  • DC charging kWMercedes C EQ +150 kW
    Mercedes C EQ
    330
    Togg T10F
    180
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Mercedes C EQ
    11
    Togg T10F
    11
  • Weight kgTogg T10F −306 kg
    Mercedes C EQ
    2385
    Togg T10F
    2079
  • Boot lTogg T10F +35 l
    Mercedes C EQ
    470
    Togg T10F
    505

Add a third car

Technical data: Mercedes C EQ vs Togg T10F

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Mercedes C EQ vs Togg T10F
Key parameters Mercedes C EQ
C 400 4MATIC
Togg T10F
V1 RWD Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range762 km610 kmMercedes +152 km
Battery94 kWh88.5 kWhMercedes +5.5 kWh
Consumption14.3 kWh/100 km17.4 kWh/100 kmMercedes −3.1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging330 kW180 kWMercedes +150 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 22 min 10–80%28 min 20–80%6 min
Range per minute of charging24.2 km/min13.1 km/minMercedes +11.1 km/min
Voltage800 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power489 PS218 PSMercedes +271 PS
0–100 km/h4 s7.5 sMercedes −3.5 s
Top speed210 km/h172 km/hMercedes +38 km/h
DrivetrainAWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2385 kg2079 kgTogg −306 kg
Boot470 l505 lTogg +35 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Togg
Length4883 mm4830 mmMercedes +53 mm
Width1892 mm1881 mmMercedes +11 mm
Height1503 mm1553 mmTogg +50 mm
Wheelbase2962 mm2890 mmMercedes +72 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Mercedes C EQ

Cost per 100 km4.29
Monthly54
Yearly644

Togg T10F

Cost per 100 km5.22
Monthly65
Yearly783

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Mercedes C EQ

Togg T10F

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Mercedes C EQ or Togg T10F?

The Mercedes C EQ goes further: 762 km WLTP against the 610 km of the Togg T10F. That is a difference of 152 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Mercedes C EQ and the Togg T10F differ?

The Mercedes C EQ has AWD and 489 PS. The Togg T10F has RWD and 218 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Togg T10F — its 88.5 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes C EQ, with 94 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Mercedes C EQ or Togg T10F?

The Mercedes C EQ is stronger: 489 PS against the 218 PS of the Togg T10F. The gap is 271 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.