Mercedes C EQ vs MG IM5

Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — Mercedes C EQ 22 min, MG IM5 17 min · 0–100 km/h — Mercedes C EQ 4 s, MG IM5 4.9 s · Power — Mercedes C EQ 489 PS, MG IM5 407 PS.

Mercedes C EQ

An electric sedan in the D class, offering high performance with all-wheel drive and fast (DC) charging.

MG IM5

The MG IM5 is a sedan in the D-segment, offering three powertrain options with power outputs ranging from 295 horsepower to 751 horsepower.

Profile against the market: Mercedes C EQ vs MG IM5

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Mercedes C EQ or MG IM5 — who wins where

It's a tie: 5 to 5

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmMercedes C EQ +52 km
    Mercedes C EQ
    762
    MG IM5
    710
  • Battery kWhMG IM5 +2.5 kWh
    Mercedes C EQ
    94
    MG IM5
    96.5
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmMercedes C EQ −1.7 kWh/100 km
    Mercedes C EQ
    14.3
    MG IM5
    16
  • Power PSMercedes C EQ +82 PS
    Mercedes C EQ
    489
    MG IM5
    407
  • 0–100 km/h sMercedes C EQ −0.9 s
    Mercedes C EQ
    4
    MG IM5
    4.9
  • Top speed km/hMG IM5 +10 km/h
    Mercedes C EQ
    210
    MG IM5
    220
  • DC charging kWMG IM5 +66 kW
    Mercedes C EQ
    330
    MG IM5
    396
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Mercedes C EQ
    11
    MG IM5
    11
  • Charging minMG IM5 −5 min
    Mercedes C EQ
    22
    MG IM5
    17
  • Weight kgMG IM5 −175 kg
    Mercedes C EQ
    2385
    MG IM5
    2210
  • Boot lMercedes C EQ +13 l
    Mercedes C EQ
    470
    MG IM5
    457

Add a third car

Technical data: Mercedes C EQ vs MG IM5

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Mercedes C EQ vs MG IM5
Key parameters Mercedes C EQ
C 400 4MATIC
MG IM5
Premium
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range762 km710 kmMercedes +52 km
Battery94 kWh96.5 kWhMG +2.5 kWh
Consumption14.3 kWh/100 km16 kWh/100 kmMercedes −1.7 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging330 kW396 kWMG +66 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%22 min17 minMG −5 min
Range per minute of charging24.2 km/min29.2 km/minMG +5 km/min
Voltage800 V800 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power489 PS407 PSMercedes +82 PS
0–100 km/h4 s4.9 sMercedes −0.9 s
Top speed210 km/h220 km/hMG +10 km/h
DrivetrainAWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2385 kg2210 kgMG −175 kg
Boot470 l457 lMercedes +13 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly MG
Length4883 mm4931 mmMG +48 mm
Width1892 mm1960 mmMG +68 mm
Height1503 mm1474 mmMercedes +29 mm
Wheelbase2962 mm2950 mmMercedes +12 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Mercedes C EQ

Cost per 100 km4.29
Monthly54
Yearly644

MG IM5

Cost per 100 km4.8
Monthly60
Yearly720

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Mercedes C EQ

MG IM5

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Mercedes C EQ or MG IM5?

The Mercedes C EQ goes further: 762 km WLTP against the 710 km of the MG IM5. That is a difference of 52 km.

Why does the MG IM5 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Mercedes C EQ?

The MG IM5 carries 96.5 kWh and covers 710 km, while the Mercedes C EQ with its 94 kWh battery does 762 km. Energy use decides it: 16 against 14.3 kWh/100 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Mercedes C EQ and the MG IM5 differ?

The Mercedes C EQ has AWD and 489 PS. The MG IM5 has RWD and 407 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the MG IM5 — its 96.5 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes C EQ, with 94 kWh, does not offer it.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.