Hyundai Ioniq 6 N vs Mercedes C EQ
It's a tie: 5 to 5
Biggest differences: WLTP range — Hyundai Ioniq 6 N 487 km, Mercedes C EQ 762 km · Consumption — Hyundai Ioniq 6 N 18.7 kWh/100 km, Mercedes C EQ 14.3 kWh/100 km · DC charging — Hyundai Ioniq 6 N 260 kW, Mercedes C EQ 330 kW.
Hyundai Ioniq 6 N
A high-performance sports sedan in the D segment, featuring all-wheel drive and fast charging (DC).
Mercedes C EQ
The Mercedes C EQ is an electric D-segment sedan in two AWD variants: WLTP range from 690 to 762 km, power from 421 to 489 hp.
Profile against the market: Hyundai Ioniq 6 N vs Mercedes C EQ
Hyundai Ioniq 6 NN
Mercedes C EQC 400 4MATIC
Hyundai Ioniq 6 N or Mercedes C EQ — who wins where
It's a tie: 5 to 5
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMercedes C EQ +275 km
- Battery kWhMercedes C EQ +10 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes C EQ −4.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSHyundai Ioniq 6 N +120 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sHyundai Ioniq 6 N −0.6 s
- Top speed km/hHyundai Ioniq 6 N +47 km/h
- DC charging kWMercedes C EQ +70 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minHyundai Ioniq 6 N −4 min
- Weight ↓ kgHyundai Ioniq 6 N −219 kg
- Boot lMercedes C EQ +99 l
Technical data: Hyundai Ioniq 6 N vs Mercedes C EQ
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Hyundai Ioniq 6 N N | Mercedes C EQ C 400 4MATIC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 487 km | 762 km | Mercedes +275 km |
| Battery | 84 kWh | 94 kWh | Mercedes +10 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.7 kWh/100 km | 14.3 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −4.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 260 kW | 330 kW | Mercedes +70 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 18 min | 22 min | Hyundai −4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 18.9 km/min | 24.2 km/min | Mercedes +5.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 609 PS | 489 PS | Hyundai +120 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 3.4 s | 4 s | Hyundai −0.6 s |
| Top speed | 257 km/h | 210 km/h | Hyundai +47 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2166 kg | 2385 kg | Hyundai −219 kg |
| Boot | 371 l | 470 l | Mercedes +99 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Hyundai |
| Length | 4935 mm | 4883 mm | Hyundai +52 mm |
| Width | 1940 mm | 1892 mm | Hyundai +48 mm |
| Height | 1495 mm | 1503 mm | Mercedes +8 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2965 mm | 2962 mm | Hyundai +3 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Hyundai Ioniq 6 N
Mercedes C EQ
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Hyundai Ioniq 6 N
Mercedes C EQ
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Hyundai Ioniq 6 N or Mercedes C EQ?
The Mercedes C EQ goes further: 762 km WLTP against the 487 km of the Hyundai Ioniq 6 N. That is a difference of 275 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Hyundai Ioniq 6 N — its 84 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes C EQ, with 94 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Mercedes C EQ takes more: 470 l against 371 l in the Hyundai Ioniq 6 N. The difference is 99 l.
Which charges faster?
The Hyundai Ioniq 6 N accepts up to 260 kW DC, the Mercedes C EQ up to 330 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 18 and 22 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.