MG IM5 vs Polestar 2

Biggest differences: DC charging — MG IM5 396 kW, Polestar 2 205 kW · Charging 10–80% — MG IM5 17 min, Polestar 2 28 min · Power — MG IM5 407 PS, Polestar 2 299 PS.

MG IM5

The MG IM5 is a sedan in the D-segment, offering three powertrain options with power outputs ranging from 295 horsepower to 751 horsepower.

Polestar 2

The Polestar 2 is a sedan (segment D) that offers both single-motor rear-wheel drive and dual-motor all-wheel drive options, with a range exceeding 590 kilometers.

Profile against the market: MG IM5 vs Polestar 2

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

MG IM5 or Polestar 2 — who wins where

MG IM5 leads 8 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmMG IM5 +51 km
    MG IM5
    710
    Polestar 2
    659
  • Battery kWhMG IM5 +14.5 kWh
    MG IM5
    96.5
    Polestar 2
    82
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmPolestar 2 −1.2 kWh/100 km
    MG IM5
    16
    Polestar 2
    14.8
  • Power PSMG IM5 +108 PS
    MG IM5
    407
    Polestar 2
    299
  • 0–100 km/h sMG IM5 −1.3 s
    MG IM5
    4.9
    Polestar 2
    6.2
  • Top speed km/hMG IM5 +15 km/h
    MG IM5
    220
    Polestar 2
    205
  • DC charging kWMG IM5 +191 kW
    MG IM5
    396
    Polestar 2
    205
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    MG IM5
    11
    Polestar 2
    11
  • Charging minMG IM5 −11 min
    MG IM5
    17
    Polestar 2
    28
  • Weight kgPolestar 2 −276 kg
    MG IM5
    2210
    Polestar 2
    1934
  • Boot lMG IM5 +52 l
    MG IM5
    457
    Polestar 2
    405

Add a third car

Technical data: MG IM5 vs Polestar 2

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: MG IM5 vs Polestar 2
Key parameters MG IM5
Premium
Polestar 2
Long Range Single Motor
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range710 km659 kmMG +51 km
Battery96.5 kWh82 kWhMG +14.5 kWh
Consumption16 kWh/100 km14.8 kWh/100 kmPolestar −1.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging396 kW205 kWMG +191 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%17 min28 minMG −11 min
Range per minute of charging29.2 km/min16.5 km/minMG +12.7 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VMG +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power407 PS299 PSMG +108 PS
0–100 km/h4.9 s6.2 sMG −1.3 s
Top speed220 km/h205 km/hMG +15 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight2210 kg1934 kgPolestar −276 kg
Boot457 l405 lMG +52 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly MG
Length4931 mm4606 mmMG +325 mm
Width1960 mm1859 mmMG +101 mm
Height1474 mm1479 mmPolestar +5 mm
Wheelbase2950 mm2735 mmMG +215 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

MG IM5

Cost per 100 km4.8
Monthly60
Yearly720

Polestar 2

Cost per 100 km4.44
Monthly56
Yearly666

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

MG IM5

Polestar 2

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — MG IM5 or Polestar 2?

The MG IM5 goes further: 710 km WLTP against the 659 km of the Polestar 2. That is a difference of 51 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the MG IM5 — its 96.5 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Polestar 2, with 82 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — MG IM5 or Polestar 2?

The MG IM5 is stronger: 407 PS against the 299 PS of the Polestar 2. The gap is 108 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The MG IM5 takes more: 457 l against 405 l in the Polestar 2. The difference is 52 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.