BMW i4 vs Polestar 2

Polestar 2 leads 6 to 3

Biggest differences: Boot — BMW i4 470 l, Polestar 2 405 l · Power — BMW i4 340 PS, Polestar 2 299 PS · 0–100 km/h — BMW i4 5.7 s, Polestar 2 6.2 s.

BMW i4

BMW i4 is a D-segment saloon in five variants: WLTP range from 514 to 613 km, power from 286 to 601 hp.

Polestar 2

The Polestar 2 is a sedan (segment D) that offers both single-motor rear-wheel drive and dual-motor all-wheel drive options, with a range exceeding 590 kilometers.

Profile against the market: BMW i4 vs Polestar 2

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW i4 or Polestar 2 — who wins where

Polestar 2 leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmPolestar 2 +46 km
    BMW i4
    613
    Polestar 2
    659
  • Battery kWhPolestar 2 +0.7 kWh
    BMW i4
    81.3
    Polestar 2
    82
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmPolestar 2 −0.6 kWh/100 km
    BMW i4
    15.4
    Polestar 2
    14.8
  • Power PSBMW i4 +41 PS
    BMW i4
    340
    Polestar 2
    299
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sBMW i4 −0.5 s
    BMW i4
    5.7
    Polestar 2
    6.2
  • Top speed km/hPolestar 2 +15 km/h
    BMW i4
    190
    Polestar 2
    205
  • DC charging kWNo difference
    BMW i4
    205
    Polestar 2
    205
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BMW i4
    11
    Polestar 2
    11
  • Charging ↓ minPolestar 2 −2 min
    BMW i4
    30
    Polestar 2
    28
  • Weight ↓ kgPolestar 2 −116 kg
    BMW i4
    2050
    Polestar 2
    1934
  • Boot lBMW i4 +65 l
    BMW i4
    470
    Polestar 2
    405

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW i4 vs Polestar 2

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW i4 vs Polestar 2
Key parameters BMW i4
eDrive40
Polestar 2
Long Range Single Motor
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range613 km659 kmPolestar +46 km
Battery81.3 kWh82 kWhPolestar +0.7 kWh
Consumption ↓15.4 kWh/100 km14.8 kWh/100 kmPolestar −0.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging205 kW205 kWNo difference
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓30 min28 minPolestar −2 min
Range per minute of charging14.3 km/min16.5 km/minPolestar +2.2 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power340 PS299 PSBMW +41 PS
0–100 km/h ↓5.7 s6.2 sBMW −0.5 s
Top speed190 km/h205 km/hPolestar +15 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓2050 kg1934 kgPolestar −116 kg
Boot470 l405 lBMW +65 l
Length4783 mm4606 mmBMW +177 mm
Width1852 mm1859 mmPolestar +7 mm
Height1448 mm1479 mmPolestar +31 mm
Wheelbase2856 mm2735 mmBMW +121 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW i4

Cost per 100 km4.62
Monthly58
Yearly693

Polestar 2

Cost per 100 km4.44
Monthly56
Yearly666

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW i4

Polestar 2

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW i4 or Polestar 2?

The Polestar 2 goes further: 659 km WLTP against the 613 km of the BMW i4. That is a difference of 46 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The BMW i4 takes more: 470 l against 405 l in the Polestar 2. The difference is 65 l.

Which charges faster?

The BMW i4 accepts up to 205 kW DC, the Polestar 2 up to 205 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 30 and 28 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Polestar 2 uses less electricity: 14.8 kWh/100 km against 15.4 kWh/100 km in the BMW i4. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 90 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.