BMW i4 vs Nio ET5

Biggest differences: DC charging — BMW i4 205 kW, Nio ET5 125 kW · Power — BMW i4 340 PS, Nio ET5 489 PS · 0–100 km/h — BMW i4 5.7 s, Nio ET5 4 s.

BMW i4

The BMW i4 is an all-electric sedan in the D segment, offering a wide range of powertrain configurations with varying ranges and performance levels.

Nio ET5

The Nio ET5 is a sedan in the D-segment, offering all-wheel drive and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in 4 seconds.

Profile against the market: BMW i4 vs Nio ET5

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW i4 or Nio ET5 — who wins where

BMW i4 leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW i4 +10 km
    BMW i4
    600
    Nio ET5
    590
  • Battery kWhNio ET5 +18.7 kWh
    BMW i4
    81.3
    Nio ET5
    100
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmBMW i4 −3.2 kWh/100 km
    BMW i4
    15.4
    Nio ET5
    18.6
  • Power PSNio ET5 +149 PS
    BMW i4
    340
    Nio ET5
    489
  • 0–100 km/h sNio ET5 −1.7 s
    BMW i4
    5.7
    Nio ET5
    4
  • Top speed km/hNio ET5 +10 km/h
    BMW i4
    190
    Nio ET5
    200
  • DC charging kWBMW i4 +80 kW
    BMW i4
    205
    Nio ET5
    125
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BMW i4
    11
    Nio ET5
    11
  • Charging minBMW i4 −10 min
    BMW i4
    30
    Nio ET5
    40
  • Weight kgBMW i4 −110 kg
    BMW i4
    2050
    Nio ET5
    2160
  • Boot lBMW i4 +84 l
    BMW i4
    470
    Nio ET5
    386

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW i4 vs Nio ET5

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW i4 vs Nio ET5
Key parameters BMW i4
eDrive40
Nio ET5
100 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range600 km590 kmBMW +10 km
Battery81.3 kWh100 kWhNio +18.7 kWh
Consumption15.4 kWh/100 km18.6 kWh/100 kmBMW −3.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging205 kW125 kWBMW +80 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%30 min40 minBMW −10 min
Range per minute of charging14 km/min10.3 km/minBMW +3.7 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power340 PS489 PSNio +149 PS
0–100 km/h5.7 s4 sNio −1.7 s
Top speed190 km/h200 km/hNio +10 km/h
DrivetrainRWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2050 kg2160 kgBMW −110 kg
Boot470 l386 lBMW +84 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Nio
Length4783 mm4790 mmNio +7 mm
Width1852 mm1960 mmNio +108 mm
Height1448 mm1499 mmNio +51 mm
Wheelbase2856 mm2888 mmNio +32 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW i4

Cost per 100 km4.62
Monthly58
Yearly693

Nio ET5

Cost per 100 km5.58
Monthly70
Yearly837

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW i4

Nio ET5

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Why does the Nio ET5 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the BMW i4?

The Nio ET5 carries 100 kWh and covers 590 km, while the BMW i4 with its 81.3 kWh battery does 600 km. Energy use decides it: 18.6 against 15.4 kWh/100 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BMW i4 and the Nio ET5 differ?

The BMW i4 has RWD and 340 PS. The Nio ET5 has AWD and 489 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Nio ET5 — its 100 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW i4, with 81.3 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — BMW i4 or Nio ET5?

The Nio ET5 is stronger: 489 PS against the 340 PS of the BMW i4. The gap is 149 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.