Mazda 6e vs Mercedes C EQ
Biggest differences: DC charging — Mazda 6e 90 kW, Mercedes C EQ 330 kW · Charging 10–80% — Mazda 6e 47 min, Mercedes C EQ 22 min · Power — Mazda 6e 245 PS, Mercedes C EQ 489 PS.
Mazda 6e
The Mazda 6e is an electric sedan in the D-segment, offering two rear-wheel drive (RWD) variants with different battery capacities and DC charging capabilities.
Mercedes C EQ
An electric sedan in the D class, offering high performance with all-wheel drive and fast (DC) charging.
Profile against the market: Mazda 6e vs Mercedes C EQ
Mazda 6eLong Range 80 kWh
Mercedes C EQC 400 4MATIC
Mazda 6e or Mercedes C EQ — who wins where
Mercedes C EQ leads 9 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMercedes C EQ +210 km
- Battery kWhMercedes C EQ +14 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes C EQ −2.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMercedes C EQ +244 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMercedes C EQ −3.8 s
- Top speed km/hMercedes C EQ +35 km/h
- DC charging kWMercedes C EQ +240 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minMercedes C EQ −25 min
- Weight ↓ kgMazda 6e −423 kg
- Boot lMercedes C EQ +134 l
Technical data: Mazda 6e vs Mercedes C EQ
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Mazda 6e Long Range 80 kWh | Mercedes C EQ C 400 4MATIC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 552 km | 762 km | Mercedes +210 km |
| Battery | 80 kWh | 94 kWh | Mercedes +14 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.5 kWh/100 km | 14.3 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −2.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 90 kW | 330 kW | Mercedes +240 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 47 min | 22 min | Mercedes −25 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 8.2 km/min | 24.2 km/min | Mercedes +16 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Mercedes +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 245 PS | 489 PS | Mercedes +244 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.8 s | 4 s | Mercedes −3.8 s |
| Top speed | 175 km/h | 210 km/h | Mercedes +35 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1962 kg | 2385 kg | Mazda −423 kg |
| Boot | 336 l | 470 l | Mercedes +134 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Mazda |
| Length | 4921 mm | 4883 mm | Mazda +38 mm |
| Width | 1890 mm | 1892 mm | Mercedes +2 mm |
| Height | 1491 mm | 1503 mm | Mercedes +12 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2895 mm | 2962 mm | Mercedes +67 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mazda 6e
Mercedes C EQ
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mercedes C EQ
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Mazda 6e or Mercedes C EQ?
The Mercedes C EQ goes further: 762 km WLTP against the 552 km of the Mazda 6e. That is a difference of 210 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Mazda 6e and the Mercedes C EQ differ?
The Mazda 6e has RWD and 245 PS. The Mercedes C EQ has AWD and 489 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Mazda 6e — its 80 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes C EQ, with 94 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Mazda 6e or Mercedes C EQ?
The Mercedes C EQ is stronger: 489 PS against the 245 PS of the Mazda 6e. The gap is 244 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.