Lancia Gamma vs Omoda E5

Lancia Gamma leads 6 to 4

Biggest differences: Boot — Lancia Gamma 560 l, Omoda E5 300 l · WLTP range — Lancia Gamma 741 km, Omoda E5 430 km · Battery — Lancia Gamma 97.2 kWh, Omoda E5 61 kWh.

Lancia Gamma

The Lancia Gamma is an all-electric crossover in the C segment, available in three versions: with a WLTP range of 543 to 741 km, power ranging from 230 to 350 horsepower, and DC fast charging at 160 kW.

Omoda E5

The Omoda E5 is an SUV in the C segment with front-wheel drive and a 61 kWh battery.

Profile against the market: Lancia Gamma vs Omoda E5

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Lancia Gamma or Omoda E5 — who wins where

Lancia Gamma leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmLancia Gamma +311 km
    Lancia Gamma
    741
    Omoda E5
    430
  • Battery kWhLancia Gamma +36.2 kWh
    Lancia Gamma
    97.2
    Omoda E5
    61
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmOmoda E5 −0.7 kWh/100 km
    Lancia Gamma
    16.2
    Omoda E5
    15.5
  • Power PSLancia Gamma +34 PS
    Lancia Gamma
    245
    Omoda E5
    211
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sOmoda E5 −0.2 s
    Lancia Gamma
    7.8
    Omoda E5
    7.6
  • Top speed km/hLancia Gamma +19 km/h
    Lancia Gamma
    190
    Omoda E5
    171
  • DC charging kWLancia Gamma +30 kW
    Lancia Gamma
    160
    Omoda E5
    130
  • AC charging kWOmoda E5 +4 kW
    Lancia Gamma
    7
    Omoda E5
    11
  • Weight ↓ kgOmoda E5 −425 kg
    Lancia Gamma
    2135
    Omoda E5
    1710
  • Boot lLancia Gamma +260 l
    Lancia Gamma
    560
    Omoda E5
    300

Add a third car

Technical data: Lancia Gamma vs Omoda E5

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Lancia Gamma vs Omoda E5
Key parameters Lancia Gamma
Long Range
Omoda E5
E5
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range741 km430 kmLancia +311 km
Battery97.2 kWh61 kWhLancia +36.2 kWh
Consumption ↓16.2 kWh/100 km15.5 kWh/100 kmOmoda −0.7 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging160 kW130 kWLancia +30 kW
AC charging7 kW11 kWOmoda +4 kW
Charging ⚠27 min 20–80%28 min 30–80%1 min
Range per minute of charging16.5 km/min7.7 km/minLancia +8.8 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power245 PS211 PSLancia +34 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7.8 s7.6 sOmoda −0.2 s
Top speed190 km/h171 km/hLancia +19 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓2135 kg1710 kgOmoda −425 kg
Boot560 l300 lLancia +260 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4672 mm4424 mmLancia +248 mm
Width1898 mm1830 mmLancia +68 mm
Height1664 mm1588 mmLancia +76 mm
Wheelbase2791 mm2630 mmLancia +161 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Lancia Gamma

Cost per 100 km4.86
Monthly61
Yearly729

Omoda E5

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Lancia Gamma

Omoda E5

Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Lancia Gamma or Omoda E5?

The Lancia Gamma goes further: 741 km WLTP against the 430 km of the Omoda E5. That is a difference of 311 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Lancia Gamma takes more: 560 l against 300 l in the Omoda E5. The difference is 260 l.

Which charges faster?

The Lancia Gamma accepts up to 160 kW DC, the Omoda E5 up to 130 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Omoda E5 uses less electricity: 15.5 kWh/100 km against 16.2 kWh/100 km in the Lancia Gamma. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 105 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.