BYD Atto 2 vs Omoda E5
Biggest differences: Boot — BYD Atto 2 450 l, Omoda E5 300 l · DC charging — BYD Atto 2 155 kW, Omoda E5 130 kW · Consumption — BYD Atto 2 17.4 kWh/100 km, Omoda E5 15.5 kWh/100 km.
BYD Atto 2
This electric SUV, belonging to the C-segment, offers two different powertrain options with varying battery capacities and maximum power outputs.
Omoda E5
The Omoda E5 is an SUV in the C segment with front-wheel drive and a 61 kWh battery.
Profile against the market: BYD Atto 2 vs Omoda E5
BYD Atto 2Comfort
Omoda E5E5
BYD Atto 2 or Omoda E5 — who wins where
Omoda E5 leads 5 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmNo difference
- Battery kWhBYD Atto 2 +3.8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmOmoda E5 −1.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSOmoda E5 +7 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sOmoda E5 −0.3 s
- Top speed km/hOmoda E5 +11 km/h
- DC charging kWBYD Atto 2 +25 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgOmoda E5 −10 kg
- Boot lBYD Atto 2 +150 l
Technical data: BYD Atto 2 vs Omoda E5
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BYD Atto 2 Comfort | Omoda E5 E5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 430 km | 430 km | No difference |
| Battery | 64.8 kWh | 61 kWh | BYD +3.8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.4 kWh/100 km | 15.5 kWh/100 km | Omoda −1.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 155 kW | 130 kW | BYD +25 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 25 min 10–80% | 28 min 30–80% | 3 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 12 km/min | 7.7 km/min | BYD +4.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 211 PS | Omoda +7 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 7.6 s | Omoda −0.3 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 171 km/h | Omoda +11 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1720 kg | 1710 kg | Omoda −10 kg |
| Boot | 450 l | 300 l | BYD +150 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4310 mm | 4424 mm | Omoda +114 mm |
| Width | 1830 mm | 1830 mm | No difference |
| Height | 1675 mm | 1588 mm | BYD +87 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2620 mm | 2630 mm | Omoda +10 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BYD Atto 2
Omoda E5
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
BYD Atto 2
Omoda E5
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the bigger boot?
The BYD Atto 2 takes more: 450 l against 300 l in the Omoda E5. The difference is 150 l.
Which charges faster?
The BYD Atto 2 accepts up to 155 kW DC, the Omoda E5 up to 130 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Omoda E5 uses less electricity: 15.5 kWh/100 km against 17.4 kWh/100 km in the BYD Atto 2. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 285 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.