BYD Atto 2 vs Škoda Elroq
Škoda Elroq leads 8 to 2
Biggest differences: Power — BYD Atto 2 204 PS, Škoda Elroq 299 PS · WLTP range — BYD Atto 2 430 km, Škoda Elroq 576 km · 0–100 km/h — BYD Atto 2 7.9 s, Škoda Elroq 6.2 s.
BYD Atto 2
This electric SUV, belonging to the C-segment, offers two different powertrain options with varying battery capacities and maximum power outputs.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, available with either RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs ranging from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 576 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.
Profile against the market: BYD Atto 2 vs Škoda Elroq
BYD Atto 2Comfort
Škoda Elroq85x
BYD Atto 2 or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
Škoda Elroq leads 8 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +146 km
- Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +12.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −1.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +95 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −1.7 s
- Top speed km/hŠkoda Elroq +20 km/h
- DC charging kWŠkoda Elroq +10 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minBYD Atto 2 −4 min
- Weight ↓ kgBYD Atto 2 −412 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Elroq +20 l
Technical data: BYD Atto 2 vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BYD Atto 2Comfort | Škoda Elroq85x | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 430 km | 576 km | Škoda +146 km |
| Battery | 64.8 kWh | 77 kWh | Škoda +12.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.4 kWh/100 km | 15.5 kWh/100 km | Škoda −1.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 155 kW | 165 kW | Škoda +10 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 25 min | 29 min | BYD −4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 12 km/min | 13.9 km/min | Škoda +1.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 299 PS | Škoda +95 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 6.2 s | Škoda −1.7 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 180 km/h | Škoda +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1720 kg | 2132 kg | BYD −412 kg |
| Boot | 450 l | 470 l | Škoda +20 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4310 mm | 4488 mm | Škoda +178 mm |
| Width | 1830 mm | 1884 mm | Škoda +54 mm |
| Height | 1675 mm | 1620 mm | BYD +55 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2620 mm | 2766 mm | Škoda +146 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BYD Atto 2
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
BYD Atto 2
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BYD Atto 2 or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq goes further: 576 km WLTP against the 430 km of the BYD Atto 2. That is a difference of 146 km.
How do the drivetrains of the BYD Atto 2 and the Škoda Elroq differ?
The BYD Atto 2 has FWD and 204 PS. The Škoda Elroq has AWD and 299 PS.
Which is more powerful — BYD Atto 2 or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq is stronger: 299 PS against the 204 PS of the BYD Atto 2. The gap is 95 PS.
Which charges faster?
The BYD Atto 2 accepts up to 155 kW DC, the Škoda Elroq up to 165 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 25 and 29 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.



