BYD Atto 2 vs Škoda Elroq
Biggest differences: Power — BYD Atto 2 204 PS, Škoda Elroq 286 PS · WLTP range — BYD Atto 2 430 km, Škoda Elroq 573 km · 0–100 km/h — BYD Atto 2 7.9 s, Škoda Elroq 6.6 s.
BYD Atto 2
This electric SUV, belonging to the C-segment, offers two different powertrain options with varying battery capacities and maximum power outputs.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.
Profile against the market: BYD Atto 2 vs Škoda Elroq
BYD Atto 2Comfort
Škoda Elroq85
BYD Atto 2 or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
Škoda Elroq leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +143 km
- Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +12.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −2.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +82 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −1.3 s
- Top speed km/hŠkoda Elroq +20 km/h
- DC charging kWBYD Atto 2 +20 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minBYD Atto 2 −3 min
- Weight ↓ kgBYD Atto 2 −330 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Elroq +20 l
Technical data: BYD Atto 2 vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BYD Atto 2 Comfort | Škoda Elroq 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 430 km | 573 km | Škoda +143 km |
| Battery | 64.8 kWh | 77 kWh | Škoda +12.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.4 kWh/100 km | 15.2 kWh/100 km | Škoda −2.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 155 kW | 135 kW | BYD +20 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 25 min | 28 min | BYD −3 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 12 km/min | 14.3 km/min | Škoda +2.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 286 PS | Škoda +82 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 6.6 s | Škoda −1.3 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 180 km/h | Škoda +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1720 kg | 2050 kg | BYD −330 kg |
| Boot | 450 l | 470 l | Škoda +20 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only BYD |
| Length | 4310 mm | 4488 mm | Škoda +178 mm |
| Width | 1830 mm | 1884 mm | Škoda +54 mm |
| Height | 1675 mm | 1625 mm | BYD +50 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2620 mm | 2765 mm | Škoda +145 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BYD Atto 2
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
BYD Atto 2
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BYD Atto 2 or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq goes further: 573 km WLTP against the 430 km of the BYD Atto 2. That is a difference of 143 km.
How do the drivetrains of the BYD Atto 2 and the Škoda Elroq differ?
The BYD Atto 2 has FWD and 204 PS. The Škoda Elroq has RWD and 286 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the BYD Atto 2 — its 64.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Škoda Elroq, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — BYD Atto 2 or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq is stronger: 286 PS against the 204 PS of the BYD Atto 2. The gap is 82 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.