Omoda E5 vs Škoda Elroq

Škoda Elroq leads 7 to 1

Biggest differences: Boot — Omoda E5 300 l, Škoda Elroq 470 l · Power — Omoda E5 211 PS, Škoda Elroq 299 PS · WLTP range — Omoda E5 430 km, Škoda Elroq 576 km.

Omoda E5

The Omoda E5 is an SUV in the C segment with front-wheel drive and a 61 kWh battery.

Škoda Elroq

The Škoda Elroq is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, available with either RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs ranging from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 576 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.

Profile against the market: Omoda E5 vs Škoda Elroq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Omoda E5 or Škoda Elroq — who wins where

Škoda Elroq leads 7 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +146 km
    Omoda E5
    430
    Škoda Elroq
    576
  • Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +16 kWh
    Omoda E5
    61
    Škoda Elroq
    77
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNo difference
    Omoda E5
    15.5
    Škoda Elroq
    15.5
  • Power PSŠkoda Elroq +88 PS
    Omoda E5
    211
    Škoda Elroq
    299
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −1.4 s
    Omoda E5
    7.6
    Škoda Elroq
    6.2
  • Top speed km/hŠkoda Elroq +9 km/h
    Omoda E5
    171
    Škoda Elroq
    180
  • DC charging kWŠkoda Elroq +35 kW
    Omoda E5
    130
    Škoda Elroq
    165
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Omoda E5
    11
    Škoda Elroq
    11
  • Weight ↓ kgOmoda E5 −422 kg
    Omoda E5
    1710
    Škoda Elroq
    2132
  • Boot lŠkoda Elroq +170 l
    Omoda E5
    300
    Škoda Elroq
    470

Add a third car

Technical data: Omoda E5 vs Škoda Elroq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Omoda E5 vs Škoda Elroq
Key parameters Omoda E5
E5
Škoda Elroq
85x
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range430 km576 kmŠkoda +146 km
Battery61 kWh77 kWhŠkoda +16 kWh
Consumption ↓15.5 kWh/100 km15.5 kWh/100 kmNo difference
Charging
DC charging130 kW165 kWŠkoda +35 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging ⚠28 min 30–80%29 min 10–80%1 min
Range per minute of charging7.7 km/min13.9 km/minŠkoda +6.2 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power211 PS299 PSŠkoda +88 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7.6 s6.2 sŠkoda −1.4 s
Top speed171 km/h180 km/hŠkoda +9 km/h
DrivetrainFWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓1710 kg2132 kgOmoda −422 kg
Boot300 l470 lŠkoda +170 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4424 mm4488 mmŠkoda +64 mm
Width1830 mm1884 mmŠkoda +54 mm
Height1588 mm1620 mmŠkoda +32 mm
Wheelbase2630 mm2766 mmŠkoda +136 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Omoda E5

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Škoda Elroq

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Omoda E5

Škoda Elroq

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Omoda E5 or Škoda Elroq?

The Škoda Elroq goes further: 576 km WLTP against the 430 km of the Omoda E5. That is a difference of 146 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Omoda E5 and the Škoda Elroq differ?

The Omoda E5 has FWD and 211 PS. The Škoda Elroq has AWD and 299 PS.

Which is more powerful — Omoda E5 or Škoda Elroq?

The Škoda Elroq is stronger: 299 PS against the 211 PS of the Omoda E5. The gap is 88 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Škoda Elroq takes more: 470 l against 300 l in the Omoda E5. The difference is 170 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.