Omoda E5 vs Škoda Elroq

Biggest differences: Boot — Omoda E5 300 l, Škoda Elroq 470 l · Power — Omoda E5 211 PS, Škoda Elroq 286 PS · WLTP range — Omoda E5 430 km, Škoda Elroq 573 km.

Omoda E5

The Omoda E5 is an SUV in the C segment with front-wheel drive and a 61 kWh battery.

Škoda Elroq

The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.

Profile against the market: Omoda E5 vs Škoda Elroq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Omoda E5 or Škoda Elroq — who wins where

Škoda Elroq leads 8 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +143 km
    Omoda E5
    430
    Škoda Elroq
    573
  • Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +16 kWh
    Omoda E5
    61
    Škoda Elroq
    77
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −0.3 kWh/100 km
    Omoda E5
    15.5
    Škoda Elroq
    15.2
  • Power PSŠkoda Elroq +75 PS
    Omoda E5
    211
    Škoda Elroq
    286
  • 0–100 km/h sŠkoda Elroq −1 s
    Omoda E5
    7.6
    Škoda Elroq
    6.6
  • Top speed km/hŠkoda Elroq +9 km/h
    Omoda E5
    171
    Škoda Elroq
    180
  • DC charging kWŠkoda Elroq +5 kW
    Omoda E5
    130
    Škoda Elroq
    135
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Omoda E5
    11
    Škoda Elroq
    11
  • Weight kgOmoda E5 −340 kg
    Omoda E5
    1710
    Škoda Elroq
    2050
  • Boot lŠkoda Elroq +170 l
    Omoda E5
    300
    Škoda Elroq
    470

Add a third car

Technical data: Omoda E5 vs Škoda Elroq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Omoda E5 vs Škoda Elroq
Key parameters Omoda E5
E5
Škoda Elroq
85
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range430 km573 kmŠkoda +143 km
Battery61 kWh77 kWhŠkoda +16 kWh
Consumption15.5 kWh/100 km15.2 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −0.3 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging130 kW135 kWŠkoda +5 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 28 min 30–80%28 min 10–80%No difference
Range per minute of charging7.7 km/min14.3 km/minŠkoda +6.6 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power211 PS286 PSŠkoda +75 PS
0–100 km/h7.6 s6.6 sŠkoda −1 s
Top speed171 km/h180 km/hŠkoda +9 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1710 kg2050 kgOmoda −340 kg
Boot300 l470 lŠkoda +170 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Omoda
Length4424 mm4488 mmŠkoda +64 mm
Width1830 mm1884 mmŠkoda +54 mm
Height1588 mm1625 mmŠkoda +37 mm
Wheelbase2630 mm2765 mmŠkoda +135 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Omoda E5

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Škoda Elroq

Cost per 100 km4.56
Monthly57
Yearly684

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Omoda E5

Škoda Elroq

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Omoda E5 or Škoda Elroq?

The Škoda Elroq goes further: 573 km WLTP against the 430 km of the Omoda E5. That is a difference of 143 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Omoda E5 and the Škoda Elroq differ?

The Omoda E5 has FWD and 211 PS. The Škoda Elroq has RWD and 286 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Omoda E5 — its 61 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Škoda Elroq, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Omoda E5 or Škoda Elroq?

The Škoda Elroq is stronger: 286 PS against the 211 PS of the Omoda E5. The gap is 75 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.