Lancia Gamma vs Mercedes GLA EQ
Mercedes GLA EQ leads 7 to 3
Biggest differences: DC charging — Lancia Gamma 160 kW, Mercedes GLA EQ 320 kW · AC charging — Lancia Gamma 7 kW, Mercedes GLA EQ 11 kW · Boot — Lancia Gamma 560 l, Mercedes GLA EQ 410 l.
Lancia Gamma
The Lancia Gamma is an all-electric crossover in the C segment, available in three versions: with a WLTP range of 543 to 741 km, power ranging from 230 to 350 horsepower, and DC fast charging at 160 kW.
Mercedes GLA EQ
The Mercedes GLA EQ is an all-electric SUV in the compact segment, offering three different powertrain configurations and battery capacities.
Profile against the market: Lancia Gamma vs Mercedes GLA EQ
Lancia GammaLong Range
Mercedes GLA EQ250+
Lancia Gamma or Mercedes GLA EQ — who wins where
Mercedes GLA EQ leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLancia Gamma +84 km
- Battery kWhLancia Gamma +12.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes GLA EQ −1.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMercedes GLA EQ +27 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMercedes GLA EQ −0.5 s
- Top speed km/hMercedes GLA EQ +20 km/h
- DC charging kWMercedes GLA EQ +160 kW
- AC charging kWMercedes GLA EQ +4 kW
- Weight ↓ kgMercedes GLA EQ −55 kg
- Boot lLancia Gamma +150 l
Technical data: Lancia Gamma vs Mercedes GLA EQ
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Lancia Gamma Long Range | Mercedes GLA EQ 250+ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 741 km | 657 km | Lancia +84 km |
| Battery | 97.2 kWh | 85 kWh | Lancia +12.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.2 kWh/100 km | 15.1 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −1.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 160 kW | 320 kW | Mercedes +160 kW |
| AC charging | 7 kW | 11 kW | Mercedes +4 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 27 min 20–80% | 22 min 10–80% | 5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 16.5 km/min | 20.9 km/min | Mercedes +4.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Mercedes +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 245 PS | 272 PS | Mercedes +27 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.8 s | 7.3 s | Mercedes −0.5 s |
| Top speed | 190 km/h | 210 km/h | Mercedes +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2135 kg | 2080 kg | Mercedes −55 kg |
| Boot | 560 l | 410 l | Lancia +150 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Lancia |
| Length | 4672 mm | 4565 mm | Lancia +107 mm |
| Width | 1898 mm | 1873 mm | Lancia +25 mm |
| Height | 1664 mm | 1604 mm | Lancia +60 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2791 mm | 2790 mm | Lancia +1 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Lancia Gamma
Mercedes GLA EQ
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Lancia Gamma
Mercedes GLA EQ
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Lancia Gamma or Mercedes GLA EQ?
The Lancia Gamma goes further: 741 km WLTP against the 657 km of the Mercedes GLA EQ. That is a difference of 84 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Lancia Gamma and the Mercedes GLA EQ differ?
The Lancia Gamma has FWD and 245 PS. The Mercedes GLA EQ has RWD and 272 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Lancia Gamma — its 97.2 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes GLA EQ, with 85 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Lancia Gamma takes more: 560 l against 410 l in the Mercedes GLA EQ. The difference is 150 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.