Mercedes GLA EQ vs Škoda Elroq
Mercedes GLA EQ leads 7 to 3
Biggest differences: DC charging — Mercedes GLA EQ 320 kW, Škoda Elroq 165 kW · Charging 10–80% — Mercedes GLA EQ 22 min, Škoda Elroq 29 min · 0–100 km/h — Mercedes GLA EQ 7.3 s, Škoda Elroq 6.2 s.
Mercedes GLA EQ
The Mercedes GLA EQ is an all-electric SUV in the compact segment, offering three different powertrain configurations and battery capacities.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, available with either RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs ranging from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 576 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.
Profile against the market: Mercedes GLA EQ vs Škoda Elroq
Mercedes GLA EQ250+
Škoda Elroq85x
Mercedes GLA EQ or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
Mercedes GLA EQ leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMercedes GLA EQ +81 km
- Battery kWhMercedes GLA EQ +8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes GLA EQ −0.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +27 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −1.1 s
- Top speed km/hMercedes GLA EQ +30 km/h
- DC charging kWMercedes GLA EQ +155 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minMercedes GLA EQ −7 min
- Weight ↓ kgMercedes GLA EQ −52 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Elroq +60 l
Technical data: Mercedes GLA EQ vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Mercedes GLA EQ 250+ | Škoda Elroq 85x | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 657 km | 576 km | Mercedes +81 km |
| Battery | 85 kWh | 77 kWh | Mercedes +8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.1 kWh/100 km | 15.5 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −0.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 320 kW | 165 kW | Mercedes +155 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 29 min | Mercedes −7 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 20.9 km/min | 13.9 km/min | Mercedes +7 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Mercedes +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 272 PS | 299 PS | Škoda +27 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.3 s | 6.2 s | Škoda −1.1 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | Mercedes +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2080 kg | 2132 kg | Mercedes −52 kg |
| Boot | 410 l | 470 l | Škoda +60 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Škoda |
| Length | 4565 mm | 4488 mm | Mercedes +77 mm |
| Width | 1873 mm | 1884 mm | Škoda +11 mm |
| Height | 1604 mm | 1620 mm | Škoda +16 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2790 mm | 2766 mm | Mercedes +24 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mercedes GLA EQ
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mercedes GLA EQ
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Mercedes GLA EQ or Škoda Elroq?
The Mercedes GLA EQ goes further: 657 km WLTP against the 576 km of the Škoda Elroq. That is a difference of 81 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Mercedes GLA EQ and the Škoda Elroq differ?
The Mercedes GLA EQ has RWD and 272 PS. The Škoda Elroq has AWD and 299 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Škoda Elroq — its 77 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes GLA EQ, with 85 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Škoda Elroq takes more: 470 l against 410 l in the Mercedes GLA EQ. The difference is 60 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.