Mercedes GLA EQ vs Škoda Elroq
Biggest differences: DC charging — Mercedes GLA EQ 320 kW, Škoda Elroq 135 kW · Charging 10–80% — Mercedes GLA EQ 22 min, Škoda Elroq 28 min · Top speed — Mercedes GLA EQ 210 km/h, Škoda Elroq 180 km/h.
Mercedes GLA EQ
The Mercedes GLA EQ is an all-electric SUV in the compact segment, offering three different powertrain configurations and battery capacities.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Mercedes GLA EQ vs Škoda Elroq
Mercedes GLA EQ or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
Mercedes GLA EQ leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMercedes GLA EQ +84 km
- Battery kWhMercedes GLA EQ +8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes GLA EQ −0.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +14 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −0.7 s
- Top speed km/hMercedes GLA EQ +30 km/h
- DC charging kWMercedes GLA EQ +185 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minMercedes GLA EQ −6 min
- Weight ↓ kgŠkoda Elroq −30 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Elroq +60 l
Technical data: Mercedes GLA EQ vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  Mercedes GLA EQ250+ |  Škoda Elroq85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 657 km | 573 km | Mercedes +84 km |
| Battery | 85 kWh | 77 kWh | Mercedes +8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.1 kWh/100 km | 15.2 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −0.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 320 kW | 135 kW | Mercedes +185 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 28 min | Mercedes −6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 20.9 km/min | 14.3 km/min | Mercedes +6.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Mercedes +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 272 PS | 286 PS | Škoda +14 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.3 s | 6.6 s | Škoda −0.7 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | Mercedes +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2080 kg | 2050 kg | Škoda −30 kg |
| Boot | 410 l | 470 l | Škoda +60 l |
| Length | 4565 mm | 4488 mm | Mercedes +77 mm |
| Width | 1873 mm | 1884 mm | Škoda +11 mm |
| Height | 1604 mm | 1625 mm | Škoda +21 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2790 mm | 2765 mm | Mercedes +25 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mercedes GLA EQ
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mercedes GLA EQ
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Mercedes GLA EQ or Škoda Elroq?
The Mercedes GLA EQ goes further: 657 km WLTP against the 573 km of the Škoda Elroq. That is a difference of 84 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Škoda Elroq takes more: 470 l against 410 l in the Mercedes GLA EQ. The difference is 60 l.
Which charges faster?
The Mercedes GLA EQ accepts up to 320 kW DC, the Škoda Elroq up to 135 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 22 and 28 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.