Mercedes GLA EQ vs Renault Scenic
Biggest differences: DC charging — Mercedes GLA EQ 320 kW, Renault Scenic 150 kW · Boot — Mercedes GLA EQ 410 l, Renault Scenic 545 l · Power — Mercedes GLA EQ 272 PS, Renault Scenic 220 PS.
Mercedes GLA EQ
The Mercedes GLA EQ is an all-electric SUV in the compact segment, offering three different powertrain configurations and battery capacities.
Renault Scenic
The electric SUV in the C-segment offers two drive variants with different battery capacities and motor power.
Profile against the market: Mercedes GLA EQ vs Renault Scenic
Mercedes GLA EQ250+
Renault ScenicLong Range 87 kWh
Mercedes GLA EQ or Renault Scenic — who wins where
Mercedes GLA EQ leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMercedes GLA EQ +33 km
- Battery kWhRenault Scenic +2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes GLA EQ −1.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMercedes GLA EQ +52 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMercedes GLA EQ −0.6 s
- Top speed km/hMercedes GLA EQ +40 km/h
- DC charging kWMercedes GLA EQ +170 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgRenault Scenic −227 kg
- Boot lRenault Scenic +135 l
Technical data: Mercedes GLA EQ vs Renault Scenic
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Mercedes GLA EQ 250+ | Renault Scenic Long Range 87 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 657 km | 624 km | Mercedes +33 km |
| Battery | 85 kWh | 87 kWh | Renault +2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.1 kWh/100 km | 16.9 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −1.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 320 kW | 150 kW | Mercedes +170 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 22 min 10–80% | 37 min 15–80% | 15 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 20.9 km/min | 11 km/min | Mercedes +9.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Mercedes +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 272 PS | 220 PS | Mercedes +52 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.3 s | 7.9 s | Mercedes −0.6 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 170 km/h | Mercedes +40 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2080 kg | 1853 kg | Renault −227 kg |
| Boot | 410 l | 545 l | Renault +135 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Renault |
| Length | 4565 mm | 4470 mm | Mercedes +95 mm |
| Width | 1873 mm | 1864 mm | Mercedes +9 mm |
| Height | 1604 mm | 1571 mm | Mercedes +33 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2790 mm | 2785 mm | Mercedes +5 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mercedes GLA EQ
Renault Scenic
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mercedes GLA EQ
Renault Scenic
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Mercedes GLA EQ or Renault Scenic?
The Mercedes GLA EQ goes further: 657 km WLTP against the 624 km of the Renault Scenic. That is a difference of 33 km.
Why does the Renault Scenic have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Mercedes GLA EQ?
The Renault Scenic carries 87 kWh and covers 624 km, while the Mercedes GLA EQ with its 85 kWh battery does 657 km. Energy use decides it: 16.9 against 15.1 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Mercedes GLA EQ and the Renault Scenic differ?
The Mercedes GLA EQ has RWD and 272 PS. The Renault Scenic has FWD and 220 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Renault Scenic — its 87 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes GLA EQ, with 85 kWh, does not offer it.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.