Kia Niro EV vs MG S5 EV

Biggest differences: DC charging — Kia Niro EV 80 kW, MG S5 EV 139 kW · Charging 10–80% — Kia Niro EV 43 min, MG S5 EV 28 min · 0–100 km/h — Kia Niro EV 7.8 s, MG S5 EV 6.3 s.

Kia Niro EV

The Kia Niro EV is an electric crossover in the C-segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 460 km according to the WLTP cycle.

MG S5 EV

The MG S5 EV is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering two rear-wheel drive (RWD) variants with different battery capacities and motor power outputs.

Profile against the market: Kia Niro EV vs MG S5 EV

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Kia Niro EV or MG S5 EV — who wins where

MG S5 EV leads 7 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmMG S5 EV +20 km
    Kia Niro EV
    460
    MG S5 EV
    480
  • Battery kWhKia Niro EV +0.8 kWh
    Kia Niro EV
    64.8
    MG S5 EV
    64
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmMG S5 EV −0.7 kWh/100 km
    Kia Niro EV
    16.2
    MG S5 EV
    15.5
  • Power PSMG S5 EV +27 PS
    Kia Niro EV
    204
    MG S5 EV
    231
  • 0–100 km/h sMG S5 EV −1.5 s
    Kia Niro EV
    7.8
    MG S5 EV
    6.3
  • Top speed km/hMG S5 EV +23 km/h
    Kia Niro EV
    167
    MG S5 EV
    190
  • DC charging kWMG S5 EV +59 kW
    Kia Niro EV
    80
    MG S5 EV
    139
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Kia Niro EV
    11
    MG S5 EV
    11
  • Charging minMG S5 EV −15 min
    Kia Niro EV
    43
    MG S5 EV
    28
  • Weight kgKia Niro EV −70 kg
    Kia Niro EV
    1610
    MG S5 EV
    1680
  • Boot lKia Niro EV +22 l
    Kia Niro EV
    475
    MG S5 EV
    453

Add a third car

Technical data: Kia Niro EV vs MG S5 EV

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Kia Niro EV vs MG S5 EV
Key parameters Kia Niro EV
64.8 kWh
MG S5 EV
Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range460 km480 kmMG +20 km
Battery64.8 kWh64 kWhKia +0.8 kWh
Consumption16.2 kWh/100 km15.5 kWh/100 kmMG −0.7 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging80 kW139 kWMG +59 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%43 min28 minMG −15 min
Range per minute of charging7.5 km/min12 km/minMG +4.5 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS231 PSMG +27 PS
0–100 km/h7.8 s6.3 sMG −1.5 s
Top speed167 km/h190 km/hMG +23 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1610 kg1680 kgKia −70 kg
Boot475 l453 lKia +22 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4420 mm4476 mmMG +56 mm
Width1825 mm1849 mmMG +24 mm
Height1570 mm1621 mmMG +51 mm
Wheelbase2720 mm2730 mmMG +10 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Kia Niro EV

Cost per 100 km4.86
Monthly61
Yearly729

MG S5 EV

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Kia Niro EV

MG S5 EV

Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Kia Niro EV or MG S5 EV?

The MG S5 EV goes further: 480 km WLTP against the 460 km of the Kia Niro EV. That is a difference of 20 km.

Why does the Kia Niro EV have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the MG S5 EV?

The Kia Niro EV carries 64.8 kWh and covers 460 km, while the MG S5 EV with its 64 kWh battery does 480 km. Energy use decides it: 16.2 against 15.5 kWh/100 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Kia Niro EV and the MG S5 EV differ?

The Kia Niro EV has FWD and 204 PS. The MG S5 EV has RWD and 231 PS.

Which charges faster?

The Kia Niro EV accepts up to 80 kW DC, the MG S5 EV up to 139 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 43 and 28 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.