Genesis GV70 Electrified vs Mazda CX-6e
Genesis GV70 Electrified leads 7 to 3
Biggest differences: Power — Genesis GV70 Electrified 490 PS, Mazda CX-6e 258 PS · 0–100 km/h — Genesis GV70 Electrified 5 s, Mazda CX-6e 7.9 s · Boot — Genesis GV70 Electrified 503 l, Mazda CX-6e 363 l.
Genesis GV70 Electrified
The Genesis GV70 Electrified is a D-segment SUV: in model year 2026 it has an 84 kWh battery, a WLTP range of 479 km and 490 hp with AWD.
Mazda CX-6e
The Mazda CX-6e is a D-segment SUV with rear-wheel drive, offering a range of 484 km in the WLTP cycle and fast DC charging capabilities.
Profile against the market: Genesis GV70 Electrified vs Mazda CX-6e
Genesis GV70 ElectrifiedAWD 84 kWh
Mazda CX-6eTakumi
Genesis GV70 Electrified or Mazda CX-6e — who wins where
Genesis GV70 Electrified leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMazda CX-6e +5 km
- Battery kWhGenesis GV70 Electrified +6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMazda CX-6e −0.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSGenesis GV70 Electrified +232 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sGenesis GV70 Electrified −2.9 s
- Top speed km/hGenesis GV70 Electrified +50 km/h
- DC charging kWGenesis GV70 Electrified +45 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minGenesis GV70 Electrified −5 min
- Weight ↓ kgMazda CX-6e −205 kg
- Boot lGenesis GV70 Electrified +140 l
Technical data: Genesis GV70 Electrified vs Mazda CX-6e
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Genesis GV70 Electrified AWD 84 kWh | Mazda CX-6e Takumi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 479 km | 484 km | Mazda +5 km |
| Battery | 84 kWh | 78 kWh | Genesis +6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 19.4 kWh/100 km | 18.9 kWh/100 km | Mazda −0.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 240 kW | 195 kW | Genesis +45 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 19 min | 24 min | Genesis −5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 17.6 km/min | 14.1 km/min | Genesis +3.5 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Genesis +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 490 PS | 258 PS | Genesis +232 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 5 s | 7.9 s | Genesis −2.9 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h | 185 km/h | Genesis +50 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2335 kg | 2130 kg | Mazda −205 kg |
| Boot | 503 l | 363 l | Genesis +140 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4715 mm | 4850 mm | Mazda +135 mm |
| Width | — | 1935 mm | — |
| Height | 1630 mm | 1620 mm | Genesis +10 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2875 mm | 2902 mm | Mazda +27 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Genesis GV70 Electrified
Mazda CX-6e
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Genesis GV70 Electrified
Mazda CX-6e
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Genesis GV70 Electrified have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Mazda CX-6e?
The Genesis GV70 Electrified carries 84 kWh and covers 479 km, while the Mazda CX-6e with its 78 kWh battery does 484 km. Energy use decides it: 19.4 against 18.9 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Genesis GV70 Electrified and the Mazda CX-6e differ?
The Genesis GV70 Electrified has AWD and 490 PS. The Mazda CX-6e has RWD and 258 PS.
Which is more powerful — Genesis GV70 Electrified or Mazda CX-6e?
The Genesis GV70 Electrified is stronger: 490 PS against the 258 PS of the Mazda CX-6e. The gap is 232 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Genesis GV70 Electrified takes more: 503 l against 363 l in the Mazda CX-6e. The difference is 140 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.